Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ahayford" data-source="post: 5677238" data-attributes="member: 6680745">Are you just chosing to ignore the multiple times people have explained what they meen or are you just being willfully dismissive? The concepts are not hard to grasp. They are general umbrellas under which the classes are categorized in 4E. You could build a fight build in 3.5e that was largely focused on doing a lot of damage but ignore feats/equipment/stats the build your hp, thus making a &quot;striker fighter&quot; in DnD3. In 4E they have just a martial class that is specificly design to do damage that has a unique name. These concepts are not complex, maybe you are misunderstanding their purpose.Defender - protects party takes damageStriker - Kills baddies, usually focused on single target damageController - Keeps baddies out of the fight or does AoE damage (effectively the same thing)Leader - Again, as mentioned, the most vague role, but includes all types of support from buffs to heals.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ahayford, post: 5677238, member: 6680745"] Are you just chosing to ignore the multiple times people have explained what they meen or are you just being willfully dismissive? The concepts are not hard to grasp. They are general umbrellas under which the classes are categorized in 4E. You could build a fight build in 3.5e that was largely focused on doing a lot of damage but ignore feats/equipment/stats the build your hp, thus making a "striker fighter" in DnD3. In 4E they have just a martial class that is specificly design to do damage that has a unique name. These concepts are not complex, maybe you are misunderstanding their purpose. Defender - protects party takes damage Striker - Kills baddies, usually focused on single target damage Controller - Keeps baddies out of the fight or does AoE damage (effectively the same thing) Leader - Again, as mentioned, the most vague role, but includes all types of support from buffs to heals. [/QUOTE]

Verification