Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Michael Morris" data-source="post: 4306717" data-attributes="member: 87">Well, so much for 4e PDF'sPDF's are advertised on and sold through website - and while it may not be WotC's intent this legal phrasing effectively bans PDF's outright. It also puts all D&amp;D fan sites in legal limbo and bans them from carrying any elements of 4e. As I said before, when does ENWorld get it's cease &amp; desist? I was being sarcastic, but the more I think of it I can't escape the conclusion.Indefensibly broad.&nbsp; Interactive product can refer to any toy or book since you interact with it.&nbsp; &quot;Interactive electronic products&quot; is more to the point - I'm not a lawyer but I can see that much.Fair enough.At one point Scott mentioned the GSL would be no more restrictive on this than the d20STL was. Well, plans must have changed.So new classes are right out since their description requires you explain what benefits the class gives at each level - gotcha.Or be hosted on a website right?&nbsp; Well, I hope no one posts any 4e GSL licensed stuff on the board.I had at one point actually started looking forward to using 4e.&nbsp; I can't now. It is important to me to be able to use all my skills in the creation of materials for my players and setting - this especially includes my programming skills.&nbsp; 4e is no longer available to me. Long live the OGL.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Michael Morris, post: 4306717, member: 87"] Well, so much for 4e PDF's PDF's are advertised on and sold through website - and while it may not be WotC's intent this legal phrasing effectively bans PDF's outright. It also puts all D&D fan sites in legal limbo and bans them from carrying any elements of 4e. As I said before, when does ENWorld get it's cease & desist? I was being sarcastic, but the more I think of it I can't escape the conclusion. Indefensibly broad. Interactive product can refer to any toy or book since you interact with it. "Interactive [i]electronic[/i] products" is more to the point - I'm not a lawyer but I can see that much. Fair enough. At one point Scott mentioned the GSL would be no more restrictive on this than the d20STL was. Well, plans must have changed. So new classes are right out since their description requires you explain what benefits the class gives at each level - gotcha. Or be hosted on a website right? Well, I hope no one posts any 4e GSL licensed stuff on the board. I had at one point actually started looking forward to using 4e. I can't now. It is important to me to be able to use all my skills in the creation of materials for my players and setting - this especially includes my programming skills. 4e is no longer available to me. Long live the OGL. [/QUOTE]

Verification