Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Could the DnDNext Sorcerer be revived as its own class?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoonSong" data-source="post: 9685651" data-attributes="member: 6689464"><p>At least with fighter it's fully justified. The class truly succeeds at portraying a generic "can be anything" warrior, or mostly at the beginning. Then we had the thief who started to erode at that identity early on. Magic user was always a lousy fit for the "any caster" theme; it has always been its own idiosyncratic thing. I know we call it Vancian, but it doesn't work like Vance's Dying Earth. It is very much ultra-specific, but a sizeable part of the community -including a disproportionate part of the design teams over the years- refuses to see that the emperor has no clothes and as long as that doesn't change, other casters that more properly reflect folklore and pop culture will be hindered. </p><p></p><p>Particularly the Sorcerer which has been from the beginning the elephant in the Room because of how vast it truly is and how the wizard existing forces us to disproportionately cover only one part of the class potential -I'd wager the class could see some split into heritage form monster magic and broader personality/concept magic-. A properly designed Wizard class has problems fostering more than a handful of subclasses. A well designed warlock has the potential for a subclass for each entry in the monster manual. A well rendered sorcerer -something I don't think we'll ever get- would support one subclass for each word in the dictionary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoonSong, post: 9685651, member: 6689464"] At least with fighter it's fully justified. The class truly succeeds at portraying a generic "can be anything" warrior, or mostly at the beginning. Then we had the thief who started to erode at that identity early on. Magic user was always a lousy fit for the "any caster" theme; it has always been its own idiosyncratic thing. I know we call it Vancian, but it doesn't work like Vance's Dying Earth. It is very much ultra-specific, but a sizeable part of the community -including a disproportionate part of the design teams over the years- refuses to see that the emperor has no clothes and as long as that doesn't change, other casters that more properly reflect folklore and pop culture will be hindered. Particularly the Sorcerer which has been from the beginning the elephant in the Room because of how vast it truly is and how the wizard existing forces us to disproportionately cover only one part of the class potential -I'd wager the class could see some split into heritage form monster magic and broader personality/concept magic-. A properly designed Wizard class has problems fostering more than a handful of subclasses. A well designed warlock has the potential for a subclass for each entry in the monster manual. A well rendered sorcerer -something I don't think we'll ever get- would support one subclass for each word in the dictionary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Could the DnDNext Sorcerer be revived as its own class?
Top