Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mark Hope" data-source="post: 3307731" data-attributes="member: 27051">The issue here is not 3.5.&nbsp; The issue is the model that you have described and how ir stands on its own merits (which you are avoiding here).&nbsp; However, none of those supplements that you mention above are required for 3.5.&nbsp; The add-ons in your model are required (at least, that is how you have described them).&nbsp; That is why your model is limiting.None of which are unique to your model.&nbsp; So I ask again - what does your model offer that I don't already have?In the ways that I have described above and in earlier posts.OK, then you fail to see that.&nbsp; Not my problem - it's your model after all, not mine.&nbsp; You have yet to show what your model offers that the current system doesn't.&nbsp; Despite your claims to the contrary, 3.5 can be stripped back in complexity without sacrificing balance.&nbsp; Your model offers nothing new.&nbsp; And its modular nature requires the DM either to sacrifice flexibility or design things himself, thus failing to progress beyond the current situation with 3.5 in any way whatsoever.&nbsp; Sorry.&nbsp; No sale here.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mark Hope, post: 3307731, member: 27051"] The issue here is not 3.5. The issue is the model that [i]you[/i] have described and how ir stands on its own merits (which you are avoiding here). However, none of those supplements that you mention above are required for 3.5. The add-ons in your model [I]are[/I] required (at least, that is how you have described them). That is why your model is limiting. None of which are unique to your model. So I ask [B]again[/B] - what does your model offer that I don't already have? In the ways that I have described above and in earlier posts. OK, then you fail to see that. Not my problem - it's your model after all, not mine. You have yet to show what your model offers that the current system doesn't. Despite your claims to the contrary, 3.5 [i]can[/i] be stripped back in complexity without sacrificing balance. Your model offers nothing new. And its modular nature requires the DM either to sacrifice flexibility or design things himself, thus failing to progress beyond the current situation with 3.5 in any way whatsoever. Sorry. No sale here. [/QUOTE]

Verification