Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Could this be the future format of 4th Edition D&D?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BlackMoria" data-source="post: 3307771" data-attributes="member: 424"><p>Upper Krust: You wanted to know why I support the concept you are putting forward but not call it D&D 4E. </p><p></p><p>As I stated, the changes (if I understand your concepts) are too large, which makes it a paradigm shift. </p><p></p><p>This might not be the best illustration but there is a significant difference between American baseball and English cricket, but they both have someone who pitches a ball, someone waving a stick with the purpose of hitting the ball and the concept of running 'bases' or an analog of bases to score. However, to call cricket some bastardized version of baseball is fighting words to cricket fans and vice versa. A majority of cricket fans would never watch a baseball game and vice versa for baseball fans. Why? While conceptually similar in concept, they are completely different games and it very uncommon to find a fan who likes both.</p><p></p><p>The current edition of D&D and its predecessors were principally pen and paper games with 3e marrying miniatures more closely by supporting them with rules. You can still play 3.5e without miniatures if one chooses and they are by no means absolutely mandatory. And previous versions of D&D had players using miniatures, just without more miniature focused rules.</p><p></p><p>Your concept changes D&D from a principally pen and paper game which supports miniature use to a boardgame concept which minimizes pen and paper and makes miniatures absolutely mandatory. Depending on impedimentation of the concept, even more stark changes in rules are probably necessary. But here is the rub - its NOT the same game now, just like baseball and cricket are not the same game, despite having a ball, bat, a hitter, and a pitcher(bowler).</p><p></p><p>Changing the paradigm of D&D from its pen and paper roots to a boardgame concept for 4e is tatamount to saying - this season we are playing by American baseball rules but next season, the rules of baseball will be played by English cricket rules. And that explains why the majority of voters in your poll are dead against it.</p><p></p><p>I like your ideas but called it D&D: The Next Generation or D&D: Gen X or whatever. Just don't call it 4e because it is now a very different game now.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BlackMoria, post: 3307771, member: 424"] Upper Krust: You wanted to know why I support the concept you are putting forward but not call it D&D 4E. As I stated, the changes (if I understand your concepts) are too large, which makes it a paradigm shift. This might not be the best illustration but there is a significant difference between American baseball and English cricket, but they both have someone who pitches a ball, someone waving a stick with the purpose of hitting the ball and the concept of running 'bases' or an analog of bases to score. However, to call cricket some bastardized version of baseball is fighting words to cricket fans and vice versa. A majority of cricket fans would never watch a baseball game and vice versa for baseball fans. Why? While conceptually similar in concept, they are completely different games and it very uncommon to find a fan who likes both. The current edition of D&D and its predecessors were principally pen and paper games with 3e marrying miniatures more closely by supporting them with rules. You can still play 3.5e without miniatures if one chooses and they are by no means absolutely mandatory. And previous versions of D&D had players using miniatures, just without more miniature focused rules. Your concept changes D&D from a principally pen and paper game which supports miniature use to a boardgame concept which minimizes pen and paper and makes miniatures absolutely mandatory. Depending on impedimentation of the concept, even more stark changes in rules are probably necessary. But here is the rub - its NOT the same game now, just like baseball and cricket are not the same game, despite having a ball, bat, a hitter, and a pitcher(bowler). Changing the paradigm of D&D from its pen and paper roots to a boardgame concept for 4e is tatamount to saying - this season we are playing by American baseball rules but next season, the rules of baseball will be played by English cricket rules. And that explains why the majority of voters in your poll are dead against it. I like your ideas but called it D&D: The Next Generation or D&D: Gen X or whatever. Just don't call it 4e because it is now a very different game now. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Could this be the future format of 4th Edition D&D?
Top