Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 3308003" data-attributes="member: 326">Hey Mark! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />  How am I avoiding it - I outlined the reasons behind the changes and why I was making them in the first post. Since then I have responded to every pertinent question put to me.Ah. Well I disagree that you 'need' the add-ons. Each boxed set is a fully playable game in its own right. However I would concede that a single boxed set won't give the options of 3 core rule books. But as I have also said 3 core rulebooks would cost as much as 2-3 boxed sets.If your question is what does my model offer 3.5 gamers I would say.1. User Friendliness. Character creation (and specifically NPC creation for DMs) is a doddle.2. Better Looking. Theres no denying that fact.3. Quicker. Less book-keeping = more playtime.4. Tactical Awareness. Far easier to keep track of tactical situations.  No it can't. List the elements of 3.5 that can be stripped back?I think your assessment is wrong. What is this flexibility you are sacrificing. Start listing things?I have listed above where I think this model surpasses 3.5. What I didn't mention was that this product also has mainstream potential.</blockquote>