Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Upper_Krust" data-source="post: 3311861" data-attributes="member: 326">Hey Shin mate! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I'm not sure I agree with you here.I'd rather have random cards from a larger pool than a lot of multiples.By that I mean, each boxed set will need a certain amount of feat/spell cards to operate independantly.So either you have a situation where each boxed set has the same feats/spells cards or they have different cards. But at the same time there needs to be some commonality.Nice. The problem with your suggestion is that to make every boxed set playable in its own right you need to have x amount of feat/spell cards. But theres no point putting exactly the same cards into each (differently themed) boxed set. Me too. If 4th Edition is not changed enough to invalidate 3/3.5 then there is nothing for WotC to sell beyond the core 4th Ed. rulebooks. So you are back to square one.If it is changed enough to invalidate 3/3.5 then it alienates those gamers, who have no cause to repurchase the same material.So the pen & paper idea is a Catch 22.Aw c'mon Dungeons & Dinosaurs is great! Its even got the alliteration and everything.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin    :D"  data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

Verification