Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Counter Pack 4: Eldritch Horrors & Occult Investigators
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shayd3000" data-source="post: 2014394" data-attributes="member: 6360"><p>You're exactly right. The problem is the consumer (such as myself) only sees the final price. He looks at that and says, "gee, I paid 8 cents for this counter and had to cut it out myself but if I buy from this other company, I pay 3 cents for a counter, and they have it cut for me."</p><p></p><p>However, lets take S&S out of the picture. CCIII Modern was published by Fiery Dragon, and the counters there are only 3 cents each. That's still a 5 cent difference, and perhaps FD did do a bigger run with the Modern counters (thus making them cheaper), but to me (the consumer) I see I'm paying more for less.</p><p></p><p>Now, when I compare it to other products, on those "other" products I'm paying less, and getting more. I just can't see what's unreasonable about pointing that out. Maybe its not fair, and maybe its not "realistic", but it IS the bottom line.</p><p></p><p>Your original statement was that it is unreasonable to expect diecut or perforated counters because it costs money for something I can do myself. From the consumers point of view, who cares nothing about "economies of scale" and where "opportunity cost" is more applicable, the price comparisons do prove that the expectation is not unreasonable. It may not be realistic given publishing realities, I grant you that, but based on existing products that are cheaper and have diecut the counters it is a fair expectation, at least for me.</p><p></p><p>Ultimatly, it is for the reader of the review to decide, and I think I'm being perfectly fair to the reader by clearly spelling out how I judge the product. Savvy readers such as yourself, for whom such things are NOT important, can ignore it, and even reward the extra point if you were trying to evaluate the product for a "buy" or "not buy" situation. </p><p></p><p>The bottom line is, I prefer diecut counters, so that's how I score it in my review. Your reviews are also based on your expectations of a product. I don't call you unreasonable when you have an opinion that doesn't agree with mine, and I expect the same courtesy. I am however, very happy to discuss the issues, such as we're doing now. Such discourse only serves to improve my future reviews, and perhaps further educate me, you, and anyone reading it. I think that can only be a good thing!</p><p></p><p>George</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shayd3000, post: 2014394, member: 6360"] You're exactly right. The problem is the consumer (such as myself) only sees the final price. He looks at that and says, "gee, I paid 8 cents for this counter and had to cut it out myself but if I buy from this other company, I pay 3 cents for a counter, and they have it cut for me." However, lets take S&S out of the picture. CCIII Modern was published by Fiery Dragon, and the counters there are only 3 cents each. That's still a 5 cent difference, and perhaps FD did do a bigger run with the Modern counters (thus making them cheaper), but to me (the consumer) I see I'm paying more for less. Now, when I compare it to other products, on those "other" products I'm paying less, and getting more. I just can't see what's unreasonable about pointing that out. Maybe its not fair, and maybe its not "realistic", but it IS the bottom line. Your original statement was that it is unreasonable to expect diecut or perforated counters because it costs money for something I can do myself. From the consumers point of view, who cares nothing about "economies of scale" and where "opportunity cost" is more applicable, the price comparisons do prove that the expectation is not unreasonable. It may not be realistic given publishing realities, I grant you that, but based on existing products that are cheaper and have diecut the counters it is a fair expectation, at least for me. Ultimatly, it is for the reader of the review to decide, and I think I'm being perfectly fair to the reader by clearly spelling out how I judge the product. Savvy readers such as yourself, for whom such things are NOT important, can ignore it, and even reward the extra point if you were trying to evaluate the product for a "buy" or "not buy" situation. The bottom line is, I prefer diecut counters, so that's how I score it in my review. Your reviews are also based on your expectations of a product. I don't call you unreasonable when you have an opinion that doesn't agree with mine, and I expect the same courtesy. I am however, very happy to discuss the issues, such as we're doing now. Such discourse only serves to improve my future reviews, and perhaps further educate me, you, and anyone reading it. I think that can only be a good thing! George [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Counter Pack 4: Eldritch Horrors & Occult Investigators
Top