Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7881271" data-attributes="member: 996">So, you started a thread titled "Countering Rest Spells (Tiny Hut, Rope Trick, et al)" because there's no need to counter such spells?  And you don't need to have enemies respond intelligently - because, if you did, then using intelligent enemies whenever the spell comes up would be countering it, and you don't do that?  I mean, yes, Da Hut is only situationally useful - it's useful in the situation where you'd like to take a long rest earlier than the DM has offered you a viable opportunity to do so.  A situation that occurs, for instance, when said DM is trying to pace his campaign to the 6-8 encounter day in which your wizard is going to theoretically balance with lower-class-Tier PCs in the same party.  ...of course, if you don't use pacing for that purpose, it would never be an issue...Invisibility was one of the other spells I was thinking of, actually.  Intelligent enemies, confronted with an enemy capable of becoming invisible, could adapt their guard routines to make their territory harder to infiltrate - doors kept closed, light materials scattered about to make invisible foot-steps immediately evident, noise-making 'traps', guard-dogs (or other creatures with acute senses other than sight), etc... Similarly, Gaseous Form is another 3rd-level, spell like Tiny Hut, and it could be countered by intelligent enemies hermetically sealing areas they don't want infiltrated.  Common practices?</blockquote>

Verification