Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 8417028" data-attributes="member: 23751">It's his justification for his ruling.&nbsp; The Predator thing doesn't work.&nbsp; It fails to explain how See Invisible, which allows you to see someone free and clear with absolutely NOTHING interfering, still allows advantage when attacked by the guy who isn't invisible to you.See, that person is NOT INVISIBLE to the person casting See Invisibility, therefore by RAW, there is no advantage to attack.&nbsp; RAW only allows a creature who is invisible to get that bonus.&nbsp; Faerie Fire does not remove invisibility, which is why it spells out that the effect is removed.&nbsp; Crawford screwed up his ruling.&nbsp; And then he came up with a crappy justification for his wrong ruling.Except that the language of See Invisibility does remove it.&nbsp; Only an invisible creature gains advantage.&nbsp; Despite the invisibility spell being active on the creature, that creature is not invisible to the opponent with See Invisible on, therefore by RAW there is no advantage on attacks.&nbsp; See Invisible didn't need to redundantly say, &quot;And the formerly invisible creature doesn't gain advantage on attacks against you.&quot;</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 8417028, member: 23751"] It's his justification for his ruling. The Predator thing doesn't work. It fails to explain how See Invisible, which allows you to see someone free and clear with absolutely NOTHING interfering, still allows advantage when attacked by the guy who isn't invisible to you. See, that person is NOT INVISIBLE to the person casting See Invisibility, therefore by RAW, there is no advantage to attack. RAW only allows a creature who is invisible to get that bonus. Faerie Fire does not remove invisibility, which is why it spells out that the effect is removed. Crawford screwed up his ruling. And then he came up with a crappy justification for his wrong ruling. Except that the language of See Invisibility does remove it. Only an invisible creature gains advantage. Despite the invisibility spell being active on the creature, that creature is not invisible to the opponent with See Invisible on, therefore by RAW there is no advantage on attacks. See Invisible didn't need to redundantly say, "And the formerly invisible creature doesn't gain advantage on attacks against you." [/QUOTE]

Verification