Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dross" data-source="post: 5395384" data-attributes="member: 33802">See, this is where I'm having trouble. To me you are coming from the wrong direction. You should START at the bolded part and change things if you want a more historically accurate portrayal of a paladin in a Christian setting.Based on certainly, but does not follow in the game sense you seem have them following. I have no problems if this is the code you want your paly to follow but in terms of chastity and humility, I just don't see it as RAW and I can't see it as RAI either.I base all such decisions on the Class Feature: Code of Conduct. There is no mention of Chastity or Humility (respect legitimate authority is the closest I can come here and that is an extremely long bow to draw).I also take the "purity and devotion" phrase as more spiritual than physical in intention. It comes out in the multiclass restriction of not being able to advance as a Paladin if you take another class.The entire sentence is: Few have the purity and devotion that it takes to walk the paladin’s path, but those few are rewarded with the power to protect, to heal, and to smite.I would only limit a paly to no premarital sex if it was the norms of that society, which potentially affects all classes.But I think we have hijacked this thread enough. If we continue we probably need to start a new thread.</blockquote>