Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Cover Art Here There Be Monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dok" data-source="post: 2970457" data-attributes="member: 12780"><p>I have a few thoughts. I'm not aiming to offend or hurt feelings; I'm an editor, and it's my job to be critical...</p><p></p><p>1.) The Red Harlot drawing looks far better than the rest of the "book pictures" on the page, and in fact has sharper lines and better shading than <strong>anything</strong> else on the page. If <strong>all</strong> the "book pictures" looked sharp, and everything else looked fuzzy, or if all the images (books, tables, foreground, background) were all equally sharp and shaded, it would be fine. But having that one item stand out doesn't work well. I'm sure Photoshop has a "fuzzy" filter that the image could be run through. Some level of consistency (within the entire image, or between the monster art crawling off the pages) is necessary.</p><p></p><p>2.) The foreground overall works well, but the background needs better definition. The few abstract shapes and lines in the background don't work to ground the images. They're somewhat distracting. This is especially true of the series of sloping boxes that go from upper left to lower right, just behind the title. Something simple, like a filled bookcase in the right-side background, would probably balance the picture well.</p><p></p><p>3.) Overall, the "creatures crawling off the page" motif works well, and is a nice halfway point between the 3E trend of "books that look like older kinds of books" and actual cover art. I like the theme, and I like the overall flow of the image.</p><p></p><p>4.) The approach of "title, subtitle" is iffy. I don't mean for this cover only, but in general. Too many titles tend to both crowd the page and impede name recognition. (one memorable example was Mongoose Press' "Encyclopedia Arcane: Constructs - It's Alive!") The "Here there be monsters" logo looks good overall (though I'm not fanatical about the 'o' in monsters...) and the "Veiled Denizens" font and size are balanced on their own, but taken together, it's quite a mouthful: "Here there be Monsters: Veiled Denizens" Gamers love abbreviations, and would probably have no problem with 'HtbM', but I think it's pressing your luck to go out to "HtbM:VD". (and I'm old enough to giggle at anything with the initials 'VD' just on general principle) I know the title issue is probably already a done-deal, but if you have to go with the long title + subtitle, you might consider adding 1/4" to the bottom of the artwork, and moving the subtitle to the bottom of the page and shfiting the title & top border down to where the subtitle was, with the bottom of the title just above the top line of the bookcase.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Taken as a whole, I think it's good art, could be a workable cover as-is, but I think with a few minor changes (harlot art, background definition) it would look considerably more appealing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dok, post: 2970457, member: 12780"] I have a few thoughts. I'm not aiming to offend or hurt feelings; I'm an editor, and it's my job to be critical... 1.) The Red Harlot drawing looks far better than the rest of the "book pictures" on the page, and in fact has sharper lines and better shading than [B]anything[/B] else on the page. If [b]all[/b] the "book pictures" looked sharp, and everything else looked fuzzy, or if all the images (books, tables, foreground, background) were all equally sharp and shaded, it would be fine. But having that one item stand out doesn't work well. I'm sure Photoshop has a "fuzzy" filter that the image could be run through. Some level of consistency (within the entire image, or between the monster art crawling off the pages) is necessary. 2.) The foreground overall works well, but the background needs better definition. The few abstract shapes and lines in the background don't work to ground the images. They're somewhat distracting. This is especially true of the series of sloping boxes that go from upper left to lower right, just behind the title. Something simple, like a filled bookcase in the right-side background, would probably balance the picture well. 3.) Overall, the "creatures crawling off the page" motif works well, and is a nice halfway point between the 3E trend of "books that look like older kinds of books" and actual cover art. I like the theme, and I like the overall flow of the image. 4.) The approach of "title, subtitle" is iffy. I don't mean for this cover only, but in general. Too many titles tend to both crowd the page and impede name recognition. (one memorable example was Mongoose Press' "Encyclopedia Arcane: Constructs - It's Alive!") The "Here there be monsters" logo looks good overall (though I'm not fanatical about the 'o' in monsters...) and the "Veiled Denizens" font and size are balanced on their own, but taken together, it's quite a mouthful: "Here there be Monsters: Veiled Denizens" Gamers love abbreviations, and would probably have no problem with 'HtbM', but I think it's pressing your luck to go out to "HtbM:VD". (and I'm old enough to giggle at anything with the initials 'VD' just on general principle) I know the title issue is probably already a done-deal, but if you have to go with the long title + subtitle, you might consider adding 1/4" to the bottom of the artwork, and moving the subtitle to the bottom of the page and shfiting the title & top border down to where the subtitle was, with the bottom of the title just above the top line of the bookcase. Taken as a whole, I think it's good art, could be a workable cover as-is, but I think with a few minor changes (harlot art, background definition) it would look considerably more appealing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Cover Art Here There Be Monsters
Top