Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crawford on Stealth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Caliban" data-source="post: 7099171" data-attributes="member: 284"><p>Perceived issue. I don't agree that it is either absolute, or perfect. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Oh goody. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Ooh, you used a lot of zeros. That means it MUST be true!</p><p></p><p>Just kidding. My counterpoint is that your numbers wouldn't really apply to a game of D&D. In a white room situation with perfect lighting and no environmental factors or situational modifiers, sure. But that's not D&D. </p><p></p><p>Dim light, giving disadvantage on perception checks, for a -5 to your passive perception? Now the passive 20 guy fails 100% of the time, but the actively perceiving guy succeeds at least some of the time. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Some of the hidden creatures aren't just nameless, faceless NPC's, but actual rangers or shadow monks who can cast Pass Without Trace. Now it's a DC 30 and everyone fails to spot them 100% of the time. </p><p></p><p>It's overcast and raining, with gusts of wind that keep moving the foliage and underbrush unpredictably and making noise. Disadvantage on spot checks, and advantage on stealth checks. That's a 10 point swing without any magic involved. </p><p></p><p>Any number of circumstances can give disadvantage on perception checks, or even advantage on stealth, tilting the odds in favor of the hidden. All that is in the purview of the DM. </p><p></p><p>The DM can even say that passive perception doesn't apply, if they they are in a situation that doesn't seem threatening and the PC's don't specifically say they are being paranoid. (Harvest festival where they are being celebrated as local heroes, a tavern they've frequented, their own base of operations, etc.) </p><p></p><p>Walking through a goblin warren, expecting trouble? Yeah, someone with good perception is going to spot trouble nearly 100% of the time, barring exceptionally skilled goblins or magic. But I don't find that unrealistic at all. If someone has invested a proficiency, a feat (observation), and/or stat points into making themselves exceptional at perception, then they should be exceptional.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Caliban, post: 7099171, member: 284"] Perceived issue. I don't agree that it is either absolute, or perfect. :) Oh goody. :lol: Ooh, you used a lot of zeros. That means it MUST be true! Just kidding. My counterpoint is that your numbers wouldn't really apply to a game of D&D. In a white room situation with perfect lighting and no environmental factors or situational modifiers, sure. But that's not D&D. Dim light, giving disadvantage on perception checks, for a -5 to your passive perception? Now the passive 20 guy fails 100% of the time, but the actively perceiving guy succeeds at least some of the time. :) Some of the hidden creatures aren't just nameless, faceless NPC's, but actual rangers or shadow monks who can cast Pass Without Trace. Now it's a DC 30 and everyone fails to spot them 100% of the time. It's overcast and raining, with gusts of wind that keep moving the foliage and underbrush unpredictably and making noise. Disadvantage on spot checks, and advantage on stealth checks. That's a 10 point swing without any magic involved. Any number of circumstances can give disadvantage on perception checks, or even advantage on stealth, tilting the odds in favor of the hidden. All that is in the purview of the DM. The DM can even say that passive perception doesn't apply, if they they are in a situation that doesn't seem threatening and the PC's don't specifically say they are being paranoid. (Harvest festival where they are being celebrated as local heroes, a tavern they've frequented, their own base of operations, etc.) Walking through a goblin warren, expecting trouble? Yeah, someone with good perception is going to spot trouble nearly 100% of the time, barring exceptionally skilled goblins or magic. But I don't find that unrealistic at all. If someone has invested a proficiency, a feat (observation), and/or stat points into making themselves exceptional at perception, then they should be exceptional. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crawford on Stealth
Top