Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crawford on Stealth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doctorbadwolf" data-source="post: 7102301" data-attributes="member: 6704184"><p>Same here. It always seemed pretty straitforward. Passive Perception sets the variable point at which one notices things without actively searching. It's what you see, hear, smell, etc, while simply "staying alert". It is only a task in the most abstract sense, but it also isn't the same thing as "not paying attention" which would probably be an autofail, or at least disadvantage. </p><p>Everyone sees the door. The guy with PP 12 sees that the door is old. The guy with PP 16 sees a bunch of other stuff. All three are just staying alert. The stuff they saw might or might not cause them to look more closely, which would be an active Perception check. They can't get any lower than they would by merely remaining alert, thus PP as a floor. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Success doesn't necessarily mean actively doing something. You can successfully understand a concept. Recalling a memory isn't really an active task you are undertaking, either, necessarily. It can be, but a lot of times the memory simply triggers upon seeing, smelling, hearing, etc something associated with it. </p><p>All sorts of stuff are both passive, on the part of the person "doing" them, <em>and</em> in question as to whether or not they might succeed. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>IMO, paying attention to one's surroundings is only "performing a task" by the most technical definition. On a practical level, especially when discussing a game meant to be read in "natural language", it's a passive stance of sorts. Like standing in a way that doesn't put you at risk of being easily knocked over. </p><p></p><p>A gust of wind would be ignored by the mechanics if it's not strong enough to feel a push against you, challenge your passive [up to DM] if strong enough to push you a little but not require any active response, and require an active ability check if it was strong enough to require you to respond to it, strengthening or changing your stance. </p><p></p><p>Similarly,* stuff that requires actively looking around/looking for, requires an active ability check. Depending on what exactly you're doing, it could be Perception or Investigate. </p><p></p><p>*and no, I don't care about any nit picking about the wording of the specific example. Not saying you will respond that way, just saying, just in case, please don't waste time and space with a derail about the precise nature of an illustrative example that is clearly not the point.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doctorbadwolf, post: 7102301, member: 6704184"] Same here. It always seemed pretty straitforward. Passive Perception sets the variable point at which one notices things without actively searching. It's what you see, hear, smell, etc, while simply "staying alert". It is only a task in the most abstract sense, but it also isn't the same thing as "not paying attention" which would probably be an autofail, or at least disadvantage. Everyone sees the door. The guy with PP 12 sees that the door is old. The guy with PP 16 sees a bunch of other stuff. All three are just staying alert. The stuff they saw might or might not cause them to look more closely, which would be an active Perception check. They can't get any lower than they would by merely remaining alert, thus PP as a floor. Success doesn't necessarily mean actively doing something. You can successfully understand a concept. Recalling a memory isn't really an active task you are undertaking, either, necessarily. It can be, but a lot of times the memory simply triggers upon seeing, smelling, hearing, etc something associated with it. All sorts of stuff are both passive, on the part of the person "doing" them, [I]and[/I] in question as to whether or not they might succeed. IMO, paying attention to one's surroundings is only "performing a task" by the most technical definition. On a practical level, especially when discussing a game meant to be read in "natural language", it's a passive stance of sorts. Like standing in a way that doesn't put you at risk of being easily knocked over. A gust of wind would be ignored by the mechanics if it's not strong enough to feel a push against you, challenge your passive [up to DM] if strong enough to push you a little but not require any active response, and require an active ability check if it was strong enough to require you to respond to it, strengthening or changing your stance. Similarly,* stuff that requires actively looking around/looking for, requires an active ability check. Depending on what exactly you're doing, it could be Perception or Investigate. *and no, I don't care about any nit picking about the wording of the specific example. Not saying you will respond that way, just saying, just in case, please don't waste time and space with a derail about the precise nature of an illustrative example that is clearly not the point. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crawford on Stealth
Top