Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Creating a Divine Spellbook
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="strongbow" data-source="post: 549477" data-attributes="member: 2650"><p>Ok, so I'm hearing two arguments from my original post here:</p><p></p><p>D)A cleric, if given access to a non-domain only spell not normally on his/her class list, can put that spell into a divine spellbook, and prepare it without a spellbook. (A slight variation from this. The spell does not neccesarily have to make it into a formal spellbook. The difference is minor)</p><p>G) You sick fool, divine casters can't do anything except their own independent research. Nice try.</p><p></p><p>Now I would like to throw a wrinkle into the mix. Since divine casters have to follow the rules for arcane writings, they have to have some writing of the spell at some point. One argument is that they can scribe the new, non-base class list spell into spellbook format. This way, an independent researcher could allow the spell to be copied without having to make scroll after scroll. </p><p></p><p>If the above holds true, then could a divine caster, following the rules for arcane preparation, memorize a spell from a borrowed divine "magical writing", which appears to be a simple re-naming of a spellbook,(contingent on a successful Spellcraft check) and then make his her own divine "magical writings" with that spell Keep in mind that divine casters are supposed to make these "magical writings" per their own rules. </p><p></p><p>By the way, I have been asking for the technical explanation here because I play in Living Greyhawk. With no DMs to provide some common sense to everything, one must go with the technical rules in the tournament format. Thanks for the posts, and keep the discussion rolling. </p><p></p><p>I understand some posters concern with a "slippery slope", and agree. The Living format fortunately/unfortunately makes house rules unworkable. If I were asking for my own campaign, I would welcome the suggestions. Because I am asking in part because of Living Greyhawk, I am asking that house rules have no place here, although I will keep them in mind for home campaigns.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="strongbow, post: 549477, member: 2650"] Ok, so I'm hearing two arguments from my original post here: D)A cleric, if given access to a non-domain only spell not normally on his/her class list, can put that spell into a divine spellbook, and prepare it without a spellbook. (A slight variation from this. The spell does not neccesarily have to make it into a formal spellbook. The difference is minor) G) You sick fool, divine casters can't do anything except their own independent research. Nice try. Now I would like to throw a wrinkle into the mix. Since divine casters have to follow the rules for arcane writings, they have to have some writing of the spell at some point. One argument is that they can scribe the new, non-base class list spell into spellbook format. This way, an independent researcher could allow the spell to be copied without having to make scroll after scroll. If the above holds true, then could a divine caster, following the rules for arcane preparation, memorize a spell from a borrowed divine "magical writing", which appears to be a simple re-naming of a spellbook,(contingent on a successful Spellcraft check) and then make his her own divine "magical writings" with that spell Keep in mind that divine casters are supposed to make these "magical writings" per their own rules. By the way, I have been asking for the technical explanation here because I play in Living Greyhawk. With no DMs to provide some common sense to everything, one must go with the technical rules in the tournament format. Thanks for the posts, and keep the discussion rolling. I understand some posters concern with a "slippery slope", and agree. The Living format fortunately/unfortunately makes house rules unworkable. If I were asking for my own campaign, I would welcome the suggestions. Because I am asking in part because of Living Greyhawk, I am asking that house rules have no place here, although I will keep them in mind for home campaigns. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Creating a Divine Spellbook
Top