Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Creating a govement based on D&D reality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stormborn" data-source="post: 3081398" data-attributes="member: 14041"><p>Let us consider the sterotypical fantasy landscape. There once was a great and powerful empire that fell. Its strong hold have now become lairs for monsters, the evils it once kept pushed to the borders is moved in between the reamining centers of civilization. What was once a unified whole (or at least 2 or 3 unified wholes) becomes a patchwork of small kingdoms.</p><p></p><p>Enter adventurers.</p><p></p><p>A few generations of evil parties taking over kingdoms and trying to forge new empires, falling to infighting or good adventurers. A few kingdoms where adventuring clerics or paladins establish theocracies with or without the will of the people, a few mageocracies here and there, etc. This can go on for centuries, as long as wealth is won and lost and monsters are allowed to breed.</p><p></p><p>Ultimatelly, however, I think an equilibrium would be reached. An oligarcical meritocracy would place power in the hands of a semi-democratic large body of adventurers under a very simple set of guidelines. Basically the goverment runs on the basis of a huge adventuring party model. Every few years the group meets (or all who wish to do so) and places someone(s) in charge based on their ability to keep the inns open, the roads paved, and everything running smoothly. "Its your turn to stay at home and take care of this stuff so the rest of us don't have to worry about it." That person or persons is the goverment. They stay in line because they know that no matter how powerful they are, or how much support they could get, a significant minority in the group could make things so difficult that seizing ultimate power isn't worth the effort. Overt corruption isn't worth the effort as there are enough good adventurers to disrupt any plans. The good guys can't drive out all the evil adventurers for the same reason. The order of the day is "Leave me alone, I will leave you alone."</p><p></p><p>Meanwhile the commoners, merchants, and others in the land are kept relativelly safe and the economy is kept flowing. Probablly as happy or happier than under other forms of government. Taxes are, usually, lighter. Most of the cities and farmlands are safer. If their are major disasters, which are rare, good adventurers help restore the area with magic and gold. If people want to be part of the ruling class all they have to do is go out and earn their place through strength of arm, mind, will, or personality. </p><p></p><p>However, elaborate rules about dealing w/monsterous humanoids and other creatures also develop. They don't destroy them all, they want their to be more in a few years or the system is doomed. Things are allowed to escape for the good of society. Preserves, goblinoid reservations, are established - knowing that they will overbreed and get out and have to be dealt with. Rules of exploration, claim staking, etc are the highest laws in the land. "Poaching" is the worst crime of all. Oh, and wealth is not inherited. It must be earned. But that doesn't mean the children of adventurers don't have a headstart on things.</p><p></p><p>Sure adventurers want wealth and power. But what is the power of a crown compared to Epic level spells or swords and armor that let you fight dragons single handedly. I think traditional goverment, for the aventurer, becomes a neccesary evil. Something that has to be handled so they can get on with life.</p><p></p><p>Now, certainly it may not work out like that, but given a significant body of adventurers on a continent I can see them working out either a totally new form of government (one which might be closer to tribal or chiefdom based societies due to the relative power and wealth of the constituants) or coming to a formal or informal arrangement to not take positions of power, being kept in check by tradition and the might of other parties.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stormborn, post: 3081398, member: 14041"] Let us consider the sterotypical fantasy landscape. There once was a great and powerful empire that fell. Its strong hold have now become lairs for monsters, the evils it once kept pushed to the borders is moved in between the reamining centers of civilization. What was once a unified whole (or at least 2 or 3 unified wholes) becomes a patchwork of small kingdoms. Enter adventurers. A few generations of evil parties taking over kingdoms and trying to forge new empires, falling to infighting or good adventurers. A few kingdoms where adventuring clerics or paladins establish theocracies with or without the will of the people, a few mageocracies here and there, etc. This can go on for centuries, as long as wealth is won and lost and monsters are allowed to breed. Ultimatelly, however, I think an equilibrium would be reached. An oligarcical meritocracy would place power in the hands of a semi-democratic large body of adventurers under a very simple set of guidelines. Basically the goverment runs on the basis of a huge adventuring party model. Every few years the group meets (or all who wish to do so) and places someone(s) in charge based on their ability to keep the inns open, the roads paved, and everything running smoothly. "Its your turn to stay at home and take care of this stuff so the rest of us don't have to worry about it." That person or persons is the goverment. They stay in line because they know that no matter how powerful they are, or how much support they could get, a significant minority in the group could make things so difficult that seizing ultimate power isn't worth the effort. Overt corruption isn't worth the effort as there are enough good adventurers to disrupt any plans. The good guys can't drive out all the evil adventurers for the same reason. The order of the day is "Leave me alone, I will leave you alone." Meanwhile the commoners, merchants, and others in the land are kept relativelly safe and the economy is kept flowing. Probablly as happy or happier than under other forms of government. Taxes are, usually, lighter. Most of the cities and farmlands are safer. If their are major disasters, which are rare, good adventurers help restore the area with magic and gold. If people want to be part of the ruling class all they have to do is go out and earn their place through strength of arm, mind, will, or personality. However, elaborate rules about dealing w/monsterous humanoids and other creatures also develop. They don't destroy them all, they want their to be more in a few years or the system is doomed. Things are allowed to escape for the good of society. Preserves, goblinoid reservations, are established - knowing that they will overbreed and get out and have to be dealt with. Rules of exploration, claim staking, etc are the highest laws in the land. "Poaching" is the worst crime of all. Oh, and wealth is not inherited. It must be earned. But that doesn't mean the children of adventurers don't have a headstart on things. Sure adventurers want wealth and power. But what is the power of a crown compared to Epic level spells or swords and armor that let you fight dragons single handedly. I think traditional goverment, for the aventurer, becomes a neccesary evil. Something that has to be handled so they can get on with life. Now, certainly it may not work out like that, but given a significant body of adventurers on a continent I can see them working out either a totally new form of government (one which might be closer to tribal or chiefdom based societies due to the relative power and wealth of the constituants) or coming to a formal or informal arrangement to not take positions of power, being kept in check by tradition and the might of other parties. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Creating a govement based on D&D reality
Top