Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Creating Magic Items with rare components?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="joshuacr" data-source="post: 1942821" data-attributes="member: 27472"><p><strong>The answer isn't made simple, Re:A simple answer to a simple question</strong></p><p></p><p>Look, don't beat yourself up over it.Don't make them strangle you over this! Item creation costs include the research time and materials needed, including how to store items temporarily held in extradimentional spaces to a permanent level. </p><p></p><p>Not good enough for the anal retentive types?</p><p></p><p>Sheesh, it's fantasy! It tates time and materials to do costly spellcasting item creation! You can come up with whatever reasoning you want; you're the GM!</p><p></p><p>I hope that was good enough to allow it!</p><p></p><p>Still not good enough?</p><p>Fine!</p><p>For you non recovered (I'm a recovered anal-retentive) saps, please follow along:</p><p></p><p>Page 248 of the DMG states the bag of holding needs the casting of Leomund's secret chest. Page 247 of the PH under the spell description (third paragraph) states that, "The cost of such a chest is never less than 5000 gp."</p><p></p><p>Now, if they still need to continue and get to this point to "allow" you this, they probally have little will to imagine how this works, or why. </p><p></p><p>The explanation is, the type IV of the bag uses the same initial creation methods of the chest so mentioned in the spell, but its storage actually is in its own <strong>permanent</strong> etheral pocket dimensional space. </p><p>While not allowed in the basic spell, item creation allows other bags to use smaller and smaller types of chests in the creation and storage decisions (with the same costly materials) porportionally, thus the reduced costs, weights, and total space allowed by the spellcasting. </p><p></p><p>The "bag":</p><p>-Substitutes for the permanent "replica" and "chest" (which should be considered fused permanently with the bag or in a pocket etheral space permanently, not able to be found without very special additional magic). </p><p>-Weighs the exterior weight of the chest (as if you weighed it with no items inside).</p><p>-Is a permanent direct opening to the specific dimensional pocket in the etheral plane. </p><p></p><p>No offense, but if you're a DM and wouldn't allow an item until somebody explained why with documented proof, you are supposed to do the reasoning and imagination. I'm sorry if you find offense at this. </p><p></p><p>There you go!</p><p></p><p>Josh</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="joshuacr, post: 1942821, member: 27472"] [b]The answer isn't made simple, Re:A simple answer to a simple question[/b] Look, don't beat yourself up over it.Don't make them strangle you over this! Item creation costs include the research time and materials needed, including how to store items temporarily held in extradimentional spaces to a permanent level. Not good enough for the anal retentive types? Sheesh, it's fantasy! It tates time and materials to do costly spellcasting item creation! You can come up with whatever reasoning you want; you're the GM! I hope that was good enough to allow it! Still not good enough? Fine! For you non recovered (I'm a recovered anal-retentive) saps, please follow along: Page 248 of the DMG states the bag of holding needs the casting of Leomund's secret chest. Page 247 of the PH under the spell description (third paragraph) states that, "The cost of such a chest is never less than 5000 gp." Now, if they still need to continue and get to this point to "allow" you this, they probally have little will to imagine how this works, or why. The explanation is, the type IV of the bag uses the same initial creation methods of the chest so mentioned in the spell, but its storage actually is in its own [B]permanent[/B] etheral pocket dimensional space. While not allowed in the basic spell, item creation allows other bags to use smaller and smaller types of chests in the creation and storage decisions (with the same costly materials) porportionally, thus the reduced costs, weights, and total space allowed by the spellcasting. The "bag": -Substitutes for the permanent "replica" and "chest" (which should be considered fused permanently with the bag or in a pocket etheral space permanently, not able to be found without very special additional magic). -Weighs the exterior weight of the chest (as if you weighed it with no items inside). -Is a permanent direct opening to the specific dimensional pocket in the etheral plane. No offense, but if you're a DM and wouldn't allow an item until somebody explained why with documented proof, you are supposed to do the reasoning and imagination. I'm sorry if you find offense at this. There you go! Josh [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Creating Magic Items with rare components?
Top