Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Creating Magic Items
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 2379493" data-attributes="member: 1465"><p>I suggest you too to read that article.</p><p></p><p>Then ask yourself: do you believe what is written in the book, or do you believe what the author of the same book says about it?</p><p></p><p>I believe the author. Monte Cook wrote the DMG, he <em>designed</em> the item creation rules. He explained more than once that in his design the caster level listed for each item is <em>not</em> a requirement, but admitted that the wording in the book is misleading. He complained that the misleading wording was never corrected, not even in the 3.5 reprint.</p><p></p><p>The author of the article above prefers to play in a different way, which is not at all worse. But in the articles he just argues that there is a discussion with two points of view who cannot agree, and his conclusion is that therefore the "best" way is to play is (doh!) his favourite. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> It seems that D.R.Collins even twisted this Monte's phrase, in order to support the idea that the discussion is confusing enough to give no credit to Monte himself:</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Monte here is saying that the 3.5 DMG should have corrected the misleading wording which seems to suggest that CL is a prerequisite, but unfortunately it still seems from the current wording that CL is a prerequisite indeed. He's complaining that this should not be the case.</p><p></p><p>Daniel interprets Monte's sentence as he was intending that CL should be the prerequisite, therefore he says that since even Monte contradicts himself, then the solution to the question is to read the rules as they are written. But Monte (the one in charge of deisigning the 3.0 DMG) never changed his mind at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Li Shenron, post: 2379493, member: 1465"] I suggest you too to read that article. Then ask yourself: do you believe what is written in the book, or do you believe what the author of the same book says about it? I believe the author. Monte Cook wrote the DMG, he [I]designed[/I] the item creation rules. He explained more than once that in his design the caster level listed for each item is [I]not[/I] a requirement, but admitted that the wording in the book is misleading. He complained that the misleading wording was never corrected, not even in the 3.5 reprint. The author of the article above prefers to play in a different way, which is not at all worse. But in the articles he just argues that there is a discussion with two points of view who cannot agree, and his conclusion is that therefore the "best" way is to play is (doh!) his favourite. :p It seems that D.R.Collins even twisted this Monte's phrase, in order to support the idea that the discussion is confusing enough to give no credit to Monte himself: Monte here is saying that the 3.5 DMG should have corrected the misleading wording which seems to suggest that CL is a prerequisite, but unfortunately it still seems from the current wording that CL is a prerequisite indeed. He's complaining that this should not be the case. Daniel interprets Monte's sentence as he was intending that CL should be the prerequisite, therefore he says that since even Monte contradicts himself, then the solution to the question is to read the rules as they are written. But Monte (the one in charge of deisigning the 3.0 DMG) never changed his mind at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Creating Magic Items
Top