Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Sarellion" data-source="post: 2093879" data-attributes="member: 6254">Praise me again then. I want my aura back  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue    :p"  data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> I didn´t want to introduce an actual existing pantheon there. And as I said back then the legacy got the truth badly mixed up. The legacy would see them like the catholic church sees saints or angels in my opinion. I got the idea from the summary where it said that people venerate the dragons of legend.  So the whole legacy does it. I just gave names to the dragons they venerate.  Its just like Maia from your contribution.My personal opinion about the truth behind the messengers: People just knew the names of some of the surviving dragons aka celestial/demonic combat machines who fought in the war or in the case of Alsixnivis appeared a little later and started to venerate them. People worship stuff like CT, Vil, family gods, their own legion standards and what else, so it shouldn´t be a problem with the setting. If some of the dragons are actually doing anything that has been prescribed to them is open for me and left for the DM to decide. I think that the surviving celestial dragons if there are any are enjoying their retirement in Celestia at the moment. I think that if a party of adventurers starts to head for Celestia to gain the aid of Aurilion I would probably place him there, sleeping near a pool and dreaming of draconic sheep.  The reason I got fed up is that it seems to me that you didn´t consider my post at all and then reduced the whole idea to a sidestream or sect of the faith. I see it in a different way and think that it is half part of the dogma. People venerate the dragons and the lizards, I contributed the part about the dragons. So you contributed the stuff about the lizards, contradicted some stuff of my post and I couldn´t find an explanation why.  You said earlier that you were initially leery about the messengers and I got the feeling that you just told yourself, screw it, throw the whole stuff about the dragons out, doesn´t tie in with my vision anyways. And after my initial post that you forgotten to tie them in, your followup reduced my idea to a sect, considered by many people to be a crackpot idea and this wasn´t what I intended. The whole stuff about what post came first was messed up, meant it differently, used the wrong english words.</blockquote>

Verification