Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Creative Exercise: The Sovereign Dominion of Eyros
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mouseferatu" data-source="post: 2115506" data-attributes="member: 1288"><p>Hey, guys. A couple of things.</p><p></p><p>First off--and I'm not singling anyone out for this, I promise--I think I've figured out why we've gotten a lot more debates/explanations, and a lot fewer contributions, in recent pages. So let me reiterate rule number four:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you see something that blatantly contradicts a previous post, you should, of course, point it out. That way, the original poster can change it.</p><p></p><p><em>But...</em></p><p></p><p>I don't think we should have any more posts that say "Well, you could do it that way, but it would be better/fit the setting more if you do it <em>this</em> way instead." I know that might be hard--we've got a solid idea shaping up here--but it violates the spirit of the whole exercise.</p><p></p><p>If you someone introduces a fact that you don't think fits, <em>contribute new details</em>. Without altering the original, find a way to <em>make</em> it fit. But debates about whether or not a post should be changed, when it doesn't actually violate prior canon, are simply not productive, they make it difficult to follow what's going on, and they take up a <em>lot</em> of space.</p><p></p><p>Okay? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Second, I just want to give you folks advance notice. I'll probably start winding the thread down, and starting the preliminary stages of PDF creation, in the next two to three weeks. Start giving some serious thought as to how much (if any) of the project you're willing to volunteer for. (And make sure to go back and read what I wrote about how it'll be developed.)</p><p></p><p>Remember, insufficient volunteers = the project doesn't happen--I just don't have time to write it myself--so please give some serious thought to volunteering.</p><p></p><p>Thanks, all. As you were. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mouseferatu, post: 2115506, member: 1288"] Hey, guys. A couple of things. First off--and I'm not singling anyone out for this, I promise--I think I've figured out why we've gotten a lot more debates/explanations, and a lot fewer contributions, in recent pages. So let me reiterate rule number four: If you see something that blatantly contradicts a previous post, you should, of course, point it out. That way, the original poster can change it. [i]But...[/i] I don't think we should have any more posts that say "Well, you could do it that way, but it would be better/fit the setting more if you do it [i]this[/i] way instead." I know that might be hard--we've got a solid idea shaping up here--but it violates the spirit of the whole exercise. If you someone introduces a fact that you don't think fits, [i]contribute new details[/i]. Without altering the original, find a way to [i]make[/i] it fit. But debates about whether or not a post should be changed, when it doesn't actually violate prior canon, are simply not productive, they make it difficult to follow what's going on, and they take up a [i]lot[/i] of space. Okay? :) Second, I just want to give you folks advance notice. I'll probably start winding the thread down, and starting the preliminary stages of PDF creation, in the next two to three weeks. Start giving some serious thought as to how much (if any) of the project you're willing to volunteer for. (And make sure to go back and read what I wrote about how it'll be developed.) Remember, insufficient volunteers = the project doesn't happen--I just don't have time to write it myself--so please give some serious thought to volunteering. Thanks, all. As you were. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Creative Exercise: The Sovereign Dominion of Eyros
Top
