Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Creative solutions to the hypothetical GWF/Sharpshooter issue
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="spinozajack" data-source="post: 6594438" data-attributes="member: 6794198"><p>Nice thread.</p><p></p><p>I agree with Mouseferatu about keeping a distinct feeling for weapons feats, so the actual problem I have with GWM and Sharpshooter are the fact that they are ostensibly for different weapon types and damage dies (d8 vs d10/d12/2d6), but largely give the same effect, -5 to hit for +10 damage. The plus 10 damage reduces the importance of the tradeoffs between those weapon types, proportionally speaking (d8 gets more % benefit than d10, d10 more than d12, etc). Which is the opposite of what it should do. The greataxe should get the biggest benefit from GWM, to my thinking.</p><p></p><p>What I would do is this; instead of -5 for +10 damage, I would say, trade either a -5 or one of your extra attacks for max damage or maybe double damage. That way the weapon's damage die is kept into account, you get up to a +11 max damage boost (for great swords) and +7 for arrows with sharpshooter. Or something along those lines. I like doubling the weapon's damage potential, I think that's fair.</p><p></p><p>For sharpshooter, to keep it distinct, I see it more like a sniper, who takes his time. So trade off one attack for double damage on a hit for this attack. Or maybe just make it an auto-crit. With great weapon master, I would make it do double damage dice in exchange for -5 to hit.</p><p></p><p>Static damage bonuses are boring, I agree. They reduce the relative importance and value of a character's weapon choice too. For example, Polearm Master combined with great weapon master is very overpowered I think, because you get one or two extra attacks, with reach, per round, with a d10 weapon but you can still use -5 to hit for +10 damage on each one. That makes it way better than both greatswords and greataxes. Plus it's still a single weapon, so you can find magic versions. Polearm master should not have given an off hand attack with strength mods for free either. Especially not when it can be combined with GWF so easily and so fortuitously.</p><p></p><p>A variant human fighter at level 5 can have three attacks at +1 to hit for 1d10/1d10/1d4 + 13 damage on each one. With reach. Plus an extra attack at +1 / 1d10 + 13 for an opportunity attack quite often. It's a blending machine. </p><p></p><p>Some of these feats were not thought out very well at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="spinozajack, post: 6594438, member: 6794198"] Nice thread. I agree with Mouseferatu about keeping a distinct feeling for weapons feats, so the actual problem I have with GWM and Sharpshooter are the fact that they are ostensibly for different weapon types and damage dies (d8 vs d10/d12/2d6), but largely give the same effect, -5 to hit for +10 damage. The plus 10 damage reduces the importance of the tradeoffs between those weapon types, proportionally speaking (d8 gets more % benefit than d10, d10 more than d12, etc). Which is the opposite of what it should do. The greataxe should get the biggest benefit from GWM, to my thinking. What I would do is this; instead of -5 for +10 damage, I would say, trade either a -5 or one of your extra attacks for max damage or maybe double damage. That way the weapon's damage die is kept into account, you get up to a +11 max damage boost (for great swords) and +7 for arrows with sharpshooter. Or something along those lines. I like doubling the weapon's damage potential, I think that's fair. For sharpshooter, to keep it distinct, I see it more like a sniper, who takes his time. So trade off one attack for double damage on a hit for this attack. Or maybe just make it an auto-crit. With great weapon master, I would make it do double damage dice in exchange for -5 to hit. Static damage bonuses are boring, I agree. They reduce the relative importance and value of a character's weapon choice too. For example, Polearm Master combined with great weapon master is very overpowered I think, because you get one or two extra attacks, with reach, per round, with a d10 weapon but you can still use -5 to hit for +10 damage on each one. That makes it way better than both greatswords and greataxes. Plus it's still a single weapon, so you can find magic versions. Polearm master should not have given an off hand attack with strength mods for free either. Especially not when it can be combined with GWF so easily and so fortuitously. A variant human fighter at level 5 can have three attacks at +1 to hit for 1d10/1d10/1d4 + 13 damage on each one. With reach. Plus an extra attack at +1 / 1d10 + 13 for an opportunity attack quite often. It's a blending machine. Some of these feats were not thought out very well at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Creative solutions to the hypothetical GWF/Sharpshooter issue
Top