Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BOZ" data-source="post: 1966453" data-attributes="member: 1241">i don't like #2 at all, and #3 leaves a bad taste in my mouth.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />  i don't have the stats in front of me at the moment (and too tired to look at them even if i did), but i think there are two ways we could go with it. as i recall, these were ultrapowerful beings who sacrificed a lot of their power to create other creatures, got weak, and went mad.  we could use the stats we were originally given to be the stats for the modern barenaloth, the one you would be most likely to encounter.  the epic-level baernaloth would exist in one of two forms:1.  as an abbreviated stat block, saying "they used to be like this once upon a time but are no longer"2. as a full monster entry, something akin to "elder baernaloth".  these would be the rare few (maybe only a handful in existence, or even just one lone elder) who did not sacrifice their power to create lesser beings.either is fine by me.  it's your query, so it's up to you.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>