Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Crippled OGC Questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ralts Bloodthorne" data-source="post: 872851" data-attributes="member: 6390"><p>OK, the whole thing I was talking about was this...</p><p></p><p>I left some spellnames PI.</p><p>If they do what everyone keeps mentioning it's <em>not</em> theft, and listing the proper information in Section 15, that's fine, even though I prefer that they asked, so I can keep records and inform them on erratta, expansion, or anything else they might want to know.</p><p></p><p>I didn't accuse him of bad ethics. He believes slightly different than I do. That's not bad. It's different. I was just trying to lay down: "You believe differently than I, that is fine."</p><p></p><p>I'm not saying: "Don't ever use my stuff. It's my precious!"</p><p>over and over it was stated: "As long as they list you in thier Section 15, it is not stealing."</p><p>That's what I'm saying.</p><p></p><p>Some how or another, this turned into a near rant, and a near flame war.</p><p></p><p>Let me sum it up, real simply...</p><p></p><p>I PI'd some of the spell NAMES.</p><p>I PI'd some of the events, places, and fiction.</p><p></p><p>I don't claim to own the mechanics. I understand that anything created based upon the SRD or any OGC mechanics is not mine.</p><p>I DO claim to own certian names and works of fiction.</p><p></p><p><strong><em>I</em></strong> would prefer if people contacted me before reusing my stuff, so that I can inform them of updates, erratta, etc. I contact everyone I can. I do this for different reasons.</p><p></p><p>Apparently, people feel I called Joel unethical. </p><p></p><p>Gee, what would be unethical about it?</p><p>He renames the work. Just quietly drops the Section 15 to into his. Reprints, knowing full well that the completely OGC, non-PI'd version will be reused far more often, ANY work (I used spells for an example, not trying to start any flame wars over anything, honestly) is unethical in my views.</p><p>Sure, it's allowable according to OGL, but in my view, it would still be unethical.</p><p></p><p>Since none of it was about "Joe's Book of Enchantments" (which I've never even read nor do I own) or his writing practices, I don't feel I was rude to him. If he feels I am being rude to him, he is free to contact me about it, and I'll ethier explain my viewpoint, and/or offer a public apology.</p><p>So he doesn't see things the same way I do. No problem.</p><p>I wasn't rude, I wasn't flaming. I was pointing out that our ethics differ.</p><p></p><p>What disturbs me, is some who have replied feel that I am stating "Never use my stuff, get away from my precious" and have totally glossed over my reasons, my personal business practices and ethics for preferring to be asked.</p><p></p><p>Due credit is the proper Section 15. If you use something created by someone else, and credit them in Section 15, then you are giving them due credit.</p><p></p><p>Oh, and sorry, I meant to say "purchased the proper business liscenses and filed for... blah blah blah"</p><p>I went back and edited it when I realized it looked like I was claiming the WotC charged for SRD usage.</p><p></p><p>And yes, I am having a trademark violation problem. Not among gamers, but with something else. Do I feel I need to protect my trademarks? Before the problem started, I would have said no. Now I believe I do need to act to protect my TM's.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Part of what gets me, is instead of noticing that half of what I was talking about, I was claiming as my personal beliefs and ethics, everyone immediately decided to beat it out of me.</p><p>Forget it. My ethics say: "Communications, permissions, and procedures." I'm not going to change the way I feel, but I'm certianly not going to insist that everyone act the same way I do.</p><p></p><p>I don't know Joe that well, and outside of this, we would probably have no problem. He sees things differently than I do. I'm not bashing him, and frankly, I take offense that because my opinion is different than his, I'm accused of rudeness. (But again, that's my problem, not anyone else's)</p><p></p><p>And honestly, I don't care if it's PI, a cool name, or a new mechanic another company has devised, I will ask permission to reference, include, or build upon it. I feel that it is the right thing to do, and the professional way to behave.</p><p>I'm not saying agree or disagree with me, it's just the way I feel.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ralts Bloodthorne, post: 872851, member: 6390"] OK, the whole thing I was talking about was this... I left some spellnames PI. If they do what everyone keeps mentioning it's [i]not[/i] theft, and listing the proper information in Section 15, that's fine, even though I prefer that they asked, so I can keep records and inform them on erratta, expansion, or anything else they might want to know. I didn't accuse him of bad ethics. He believes slightly different than I do. That's not bad. It's different. I was just trying to lay down: "You believe differently than I, that is fine." I'm not saying: "Don't ever use my stuff. It's my precious!" over and over it was stated: "As long as they list you in thier Section 15, it is not stealing." That's what I'm saying. Some how or another, this turned into a near rant, and a near flame war. Let me sum it up, real simply... I PI'd some of the spell NAMES. I PI'd some of the events, places, and fiction. I don't claim to own the mechanics. I understand that anything created based upon the SRD or any OGC mechanics is not mine. I DO claim to own certian names and works of fiction. [b][i]I[/i][/b] would prefer if people contacted me before reusing my stuff, so that I can inform them of updates, erratta, etc. I contact everyone I can. I do this for different reasons. Apparently, people feel I called Joel unethical. [b][/b] Gee, what would be unethical about it? He renames the work. Just quietly drops the Section 15 to into his. Reprints, knowing full well that the completely OGC, non-PI'd version will be reused far more often, ANY work (I used spells for an example, not trying to start any flame wars over anything, honestly) is unethical in my views. Sure, it's allowable according to OGL, but in my view, it would still be unethical. Since none of it was about "Joe's Book of Enchantments" (which I've never even read nor do I own) or his writing practices, I don't feel I was rude to him. If he feels I am being rude to him, he is free to contact me about it, and I'll ethier explain my viewpoint, and/or offer a public apology. So he doesn't see things the same way I do. No problem. I wasn't rude, I wasn't flaming. I was pointing out that our ethics differ. What disturbs me, is some who have replied feel that I am stating "Never use my stuff, get away from my precious" and have totally glossed over my reasons, my personal business practices and ethics for preferring to be asked. Due credit is the proper Section 15. If you use something created by someone else, and credit them in Section 15, then you are giving them due credit. Oh, and sorry, I meant to say "purchased the proper business liscenses and filed for... blah blah blah" I went back and edited it when I realized it looked like I was claiming the WotC charged for SRD usage. And yes, I am having a trademark violation problem. Not among gamers, but with something else. Do I feel I need to protect my trademarks? Before the problem started, I would have said no. Now I believe I do need to act to protect my TM's. Part of what gets me, is instead of noticing that half of what I was talking about, I was claiming as my personal beliefs and ethics, everyone immediately decided to beat it out of me. Forget it. My ethics say: "Communications, permissions, and procedures." I'm not going to change the way I feel, but I'm certianly not going to insist that everyone act the same way I do. I don't know Joe that well, and outside of this, we would probably have no problem. He sees things differently than I do. I'm not bashing him, and frankly, I take offense that because my opinion is different than his, I'm accused of rudeness. (But again, that's my problem, not anyone else's) And honestly, I don't care if it's PI, a cool name, or a new mechanic another company has devised, I will ask permission to reference, include, or build upon it. I feel that it is the right thing to do, and the professional way to behave. I'm not saying agree or disagree with me, it's just the way I feel. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Crippled OGC Questions
Top