Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Noah Fentz" data-source="post: 5419471" data-attributes="member: 41955">Honestly, I think that one is just as bad, if not worse than the one I generated. I realize the DC 15 DEX check makes it easier to avoid, and you've made some things impossible for higher DEX, but the odds/probabilities are even down the board for each particular player. I'd MUCH rather have a 1% of the worst possible scenario than having it all even odds.I also threw in some WILL saves for those without a decent DEX. Not all fighters focus on high DEX.I've checked the fumble deck out, and I see there's some really harsh fumbles in there and for spellcasters to boot. Let's not get them involved, too! I hope to run a campaign when he gets tired of doing it and show him life with fumbles on the receiving end.<img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/devious.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":]" title="Devious    :]" data-shortname=":]" />Overall, I think the table I proposed would work best with a second roll to 'check' if it's a fumble at all. At least even then, there's a save chance to still avoid it. It may be a lot of rolling, but if the DM insists on using fumbles in their campaign, they should be best represented as accurately as possible, IMO.</blockquote>