Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Haiku Elvis" data-source="post: 9087889" data-attributes="member: 7032874">I was one of those expecting Daggerheart to be more of a D20 variant a la Tales of the Valiant so I'm quite surprised they are making more of a jump.  However from reading [USER=7042224]@DevL[/USER] 's post about the odds and the fact TNs would be roughly convertible, maybe it's not as far away as it first appears. The use of advantage and disadvantage  and I saw "long rest" on the character sheet in the video, leans towards a game designed to be relatable to D&D players despite some major conceptual differences in game style. Which would make a lot of sense given their fan base/target market.PS as someone who doesn't like initiative (apart from Troika!'s randomised take) I applaud their no initiative initiative. Let us all throw off the shackles of rigid turn order and be truly free! <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="😁" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f601.png" title="Beaming face with smiling eyes    :grin:" data-shortname=":grin:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" />PPS MCDM in a recent video on their new game also ran into the issue of whiffing on your turn being a null result and having the enemy attack be more of a result of your failed roll than a separate enemy turn so something interesting always happens on your go. The revolution starts here baby.</blockquote>