Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Corporate Dog" data-source="post: 110321" data-attributes="member: 2512">How do you figure? If it doesn't use the SAME software/configuration as this forum, it's pretty close.As for starting a 'war' between the two sites, I can't think of anything that would be more useless or petty. The people who think there's some kind of competition going on here between the sites are the same drooling mouth-breathers who will argue for hours on topics such as 'PS2 vs. XBox' or 'Star Wars vs. FOTR' or any number of lame non-issues which ultimately come down to a personal preference.At ENWorld, the focus is on d20. That's cool, and I like coming here for that fact. At rpg.net, the focus is much broader, encompassing RPGs of every make, model, and style. To generalize and say that a mjaority of regulars there prefer &quot;rules-light&quot; is just ignorant. Go look in their main forum, and I bet at least half of the threads there on a given day discuss d20, d6/Legend, Palladium, and a multitude of other systems which are FAR from rules-light.As for the disagreements that rpg.net is known for? Let's put it this way... if I create a web site about the Boston Red Sox, it's going to attract a majority of Red Sox fans, who will have a few minor arguments from time to time, but generally get along. If I create a web site about Major League Baseball in general, forget about it. All bets are off when I seat Yankees fans (damn them) next to Sox fans.That doesn't make my MLB site any better or worse than my Sox site, now, does it?Regards,Corporate Dog</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Corporate Dog, post: 110321, member: 2512"] How do you figure? If it doesn't use the SAME software/configuration as this forum, it's pretty close. As for starting a 'war' between the two sites, I can't think of anything that would be more useless or petty. The people who think there's some kind of competition going on here between the sites are the same drooling mouth-breathers who will argue for hours on topics such as 'PS2 vs. XBox' or 'Star Wars vs. FOTR' or any number of lame non-issues which ultimately come down to a personal preference. At ENWorld, the focus is on d20. That's cool, and I like coming here for that fact. At rpg.net, the focus is much broader, encompassing RPGs of every make, model, and style. To generalize and say that a mjaority of regulars there prefer "rules-light" is just ignorant. Go look in their main forum, and I bet at least half of the threads there on a given day discuss d20, d6/Legend, Palladium, and a multitude of other systems which are FAR from rules-light. As for the disagreements that rpg.net is known for? Let's put it this way... if I create a web site about the Boston Red Sox, it's going to attract a majority of Red Sox fans, who will have a few minor arguments from time to time, but generally get along. If I create a web site about Major League Baseball in general, forget about it. All bets are off when I seat Yankees fans (damn them) next to Sox fans. That doesn't make my MLB site any better or worse than my Sox site, now, does it? Regards, Corporate Dog [/QUOTE]

Verification