Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Critique my shadow based PrC
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pants" data-source="post: 1643990" data-attributes="member: 8849"><p>Good. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Never thought of that...</p><p>Nothing, I guess </p><p></p><p></p><p>It's meant to be the 'cost' for entering the class. Essentially, the feat is based loosely off of the Shadow Weave feat from the FRCS, however with less drawbacks, powers, and stringent restrictions. </p><p></p><p></p><p>I tend to think that a PrC should help to further 'specialize' a character's focus, making him possibly weaker in one or two areas but stronger in an other single, defining area.</p><p>Then again, I don't want to go overboard in one area and make the class too viable or unviable if a PC were to show interest in it. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Yoink. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>I especially like the Shadow transformation and Shadow Sorcery.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hm, I really liked how the mage gets better at using darkness, but gets invariably worse at casting fire spells. I dunno though, I want to give an incentive to continue going on in the PrC, but I rather like the flavor of the original ability.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I'll just use my original, if only because these mages are tapping into the powers of darkness, it should be nigh to impossible to cast spells that create light. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well, IMC the Shadow Mages are a splinter group of mages that learned to tap into the power of the Plane of Shadow in order to power their magic. Normal wizards and spellcasters tap into the Transdimensional Plane of Energy to power their magic. Currently, there is a sort of power struggle going on between the Mages Guild and the Shadow Mages. The Shadow Mages want to work in peace and establish their own guild in the empire, while the Mages Guild wants to capitilize on this power and use it for their own benefit. Shadow Mages are those Wizards and Sorcerers who have mastered the art of Shadow Magic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pants, post: 1643990, member: 8849"] Good. :p Never thought of that... Nothing, I guess It's meant to be the 'cost' for entering the class. Essentially, the feat is based loosely off of the Shadow Weave feat from the FRCS, however with less drawbacks, powers, and stringent restrictions. I tend to think that a PrC should help to further 'specialize' a character's focus, making him possibly weaker in one or two areas but stronger in an other single, defining area. Then again, I don't want to go overboard in one area and make the class too viable or unviable if a PC were to show interest in it. Yoink. ;) I especially like the Shadow transformation and Shadow Sorcery. Hm, I really liked how the mage gets better at using darkness, but gets invariably worse at casting fire spells. I dunno though, I want to give an incentive to continue going on in the PrC, but I rather like the flavor of the original ability. I'll just use my original, if only because these mages are tapping into the powers of darkness, it should be nigh to impossible to cast spells that create light. :p Well, IMC the Shadow Mages are a splinter group of mages that learned to tap into the power of the Plane of Shadow in order to power their magic. Normal wizards and spellcasters tap into the Transdimensional Plane of Energy to power their magic. Currently, there is a sort of power struggle going on between the Mages Guild and the Shadow Mages. The Shadow Mages want to work in peace and establish their own guild in the empire, while the Mages Guild wants to capitilize on this power and use it for their own benefit. Shadow Mages are those Wizards and Sorcerers who have mastered the art of Shadow Magic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Critique my shadow based PrC
Top