Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Critique this house rule - blank spell slots
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thedmstrikes" data-source="post: 4861555" data-attributes="member: 56834"><p>I can definitely see Hawkins point. In an effort to avert the overpoweredness he suggests, I submit that the new ability be a feat with the following prerequisite added:</p><p> </p><p>Prerequisite: Arcane spellcaster that prepares spells as a wizard</p><p> </p><p>The description should also be ammended to state that using a blank spell slot with metamagic is a full round action, same as it is for sorcerors who use metamagic with their spells. Likewise, if you think this is not hard enough on the wizard, then make using a spell slot instead of a prepared spell a full round action, instead of a standard action and applying metamagic is not possible without an additional feat of some sort.</p><p> </p><p>Further, I suggest that it break down into three seperate feats titled, minor open slot, lessor open slot, and major (or greater) open slot. For minor, the spells are limited to 2nd level and below (including cantrips) and has prerequisite of 3rd level arcane caster. For lesser, it includes 3rd to 5th and includes the minor slot feat as a prerequisite, as well as, a caster level requirement comensurate with the minimum to cast a 5th level spell. The final one being just as harsh as the lesser one in prerequisites.</p><p> </p><p>This will slower the usefulnes of the ability as well as restrict its wide usage and abuse. Further, its high cost in feats will require the wizard to practically specialize in this type of spellcasting in order for it to be useful to the advantage suggested by Hawken. One last note, if you do not htink that this is restrictive enough then you can make the benefit restricted to a single spell slot within the level range instead of one per level. All of this put together should keep the run of the mill NPCs from being stacked with this particular ability.</p><p> </p><p>Honestly, I like the idea for the same reason Dannyalcatraz suggests (sorcerors can act like wizards sometimes too) and I would definitely consider this tree for my games.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thedmstrikes, post: 4861555, member: 56834"] I can definitely see Hawkins point. In an effort to avert the overpoweredness he suggests, I submit that the new ability be a feat with the following prerequisite added: Prerequisite: Arcane spellcaster that prepares spells as a wizard The description should also be ammended to state that using a blank spell slot with metamagic is a full round action, same as it is for sorcerors who use metamagic with their spells. Likewise, if you think this is not hard enough on the wizard, then make using a spell slot instead of a prepared spell a full round action, instead of a standard action and applying metamagic is not possible without an additional feat of some sort. Further, I suggest that it break down into three seperate feats titled, minor open slot, lessor open slot, and major (or greater) open slot. For minor, the spells are limited to 2nd level and below (including cantrips) and has prerequisite of 3rd level arcane caster. For lesser, it includes 3rd to 5th and includes the minor slot feat as a prerequisite, as well as, a caster level requirement comensurate with the minimum to cast a 5th level spell. The final one being just as harsh as the lesser one in prerequisites. This will slower the usefulnes of the ability as well as restrict its wide usage and abuse. Further, its high cost in feats will require the wizard to practically specialize in this type of spellcasting in order for it to be useful to the advantage suggested by Hawken. One last note, if you do not htink that this is restrictive enough then you can make the benefit restricted to a single spell slot within the level range instead of one per level. All of this put together should keep the run of the mill NPCs from being stacked with this particular ability. Honestly, I like the idea for the same reason Dannyalcatraz suggests (sorcerors can act like wizards sometimes too) and I would definitely consider this tree for my games. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Critique this house rule - blank spell slots
Top