Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Critiquing the System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7878975" data-attributes="member: 6987520"><p>When people reply in a way that seems out of line with what you are talking about, there is obviously some confusion somewhere. The problem is they (myself included) <em>think</em> they know what you are talking about but in reality you are talking about something else. This happens often enough on message boards as we all know.</p><p></p><p>But instead of expounding on your thoughts at that point to help ensure everyone is on the same topic, you tell them to re-read your posts. So in that respect I agree with [USER=6777737]@Bacon Bits[/USER] . Telling people to reread your posts instead of addressing a possible confusion is a bit offensive to the reader because you are implying they either were too lazy to actually read your posts or too stupid to understand you and should try again.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, my point is when there is a misunderstanding on a message board, most of the time there is some cross-wired thinking on both sides. You could have replied, "Why are you addressing that point? I was discussing this point, in case I wasn't clear." so you could fine the source of the confusion, address it, and move on with a meaningful conversation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7878975, member: 6987520"] When people reply in a way that seems out of line with what you are talking about, there is obviously some confusion somewhere. The problem is they (myself included) [I]think[/I] they know what you are talking about but in reality you are talking about something else. This happens often enough on message boards as we all know. But instead of expounding on your thoughts at that point to help ensure everyone is on the same topic, you tell them to re-read your posts. So in that respect I agree with [USER=6777737]@Bacon Bits[/USER] . Telling people to reread your posts instead of addressing a possible confusion is a bit offensive to the reader because you are implying they either were too lazy to actually read your posts or too stupid to understand you and should try again. Anyway, my point is when there is a misunderstanding on a message board, most of the time there is some cross-wired thinking on both sides. You could have replied, "Why are you addressing that point? I was discussing this point, in case I wasn't clear." so you could fine the source of the confusion, address it, and move on with a meaningful conversation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Critiquing the System
Top