Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DND_Reborn" data-source="post: 7878988" data-attributes="member: 6987520">I was one of the people who misunderstood him the first time. Because of the way he wrote, it seemed to lack coherence and flow, and so I stopped bothering. Others posted replies which I had considered myself, and he reacted &quot;reread it&quot; in a manner that implied he was too busy to bother trying to explain himself further.I understand how people read his posts in a manner he didn't expect and got something else from his meaning. If they already think one thing, telling them to re-read it will more likely be met with hostility because it is a hostile position to take. It's unfortunate because it escalates and leads to nowhere constructive.I am sure many people understood him the first &quot;read through&quot; but it seems to me a number of people read his posts and didn't. Nothing wrong with that. I've had to explain myself to replies often enough so I could help get rid of confusion....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DND_Reborn, post: 7878988, member: 6987520"] I was one of the people who misunderstood him the first time. Because of the way he wrote, it seemed to lack coherence and flow, and so I stopped bothering. Others posted replies which I had considered myself, and he reacted "reread it" in a manner that implied he was too busy to bother trying to explain himself further. I understand how people read his posts in a manner he didn't expect and got something else from his meaning. If they already think one thing, telling them to re-read it will more likely be met with hostility because it is a hostile position to take. It's unfortunate because it escalates and leads to nowhere constructive. I am sure many people understood him the first "read through" but it seems to me a number of people read his posts and didn't. Nothing wrong with that. I've had to explain myself to replies often enough so I could help get rid of confusion.... [/QUOTE]

Verification