Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Li Shenron" data-source="post: 930112" data-attributes="member: 1465">I don't think 1 level less is enough. Compare the feat with Extra Spell (mostly for Sorcerers), which lets you learn a new spell FROM YOUR LIST, but the spell must be of level less than your highest current spell level. So a 4th level Sor or 3rd level Wiz could choose a 0th or 1st level spell only. I like the idea of a feat that lets you learn a spell from someone else's list without multiclassing, but I'd make it AT LEAST 2 level less than your highest spell level. This would also prevent Clerics with Wish or Wizards with Miracle, or other similar powerful spells. I think the cost of a feat is high enough to prevent spellcasters too much crossbred (not more than 8 feats/spells in 20 levels, who's going to spend more than 1-2 for extra unavailable spells if they are 2 level less than their max?).I really like this idea, I never thought about it before... also the extra requirement of appropriate Knowledge (with ranks depending on the spell level) makes very sense and force the PC to follow a general concept.</blockquote>