Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crossbow Expert redux
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CapnZapp" data-source="post: 7230380" data-attributes="member: 12731"><p>Short answer: "yes" <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Longer answer:</p><p></p><p>My intent is for the Crossbow Expert to be able to fire one bolt with her action, then one more bolt with her bonus action. Total 2 bolts fired, sustained (=in any round).</p><p></p><p>If you have found that my phrasing doesn't really support this RAI, I would be much obliged.</p><p></p><p>So, yes, you can:</p><p></p><p>Wield a rapier and a hand crossbow. A level 5 fighter would make two rapier attacks and one hand crossbow attack. Each round. This is comparable to two-weapon fighting. </p><p></p><p>You can wield one hand crossbow. The fighter would make only two hand crossbow attacks, one with your action, a second with your bonus action. The loading of the action attack is taken care of the general rule that you load ammunition as part of your attack; the loading of the bonus action attack is (redundantly, though I know vonklaude has a differing opinion here) taken care of the phrasing of the Crossbow Expert language. </p><p></p><p>You <em>can</em> wield two hand crossbows. This would leave you with one unloaded hand crossbow after your turn though, since you have no hand free to reload the first one. The bonus attack one is taken care of the phrasing of the feat, but not the attack one. <em>The key is that the feat langauge voids the "hand free" part, as opposed to the "load is free as part of attack" part.</em></p><p></p><p>You could go hand crossbow plus shield, but again, after the first round your h-X-bow would be empty. In the second round, you would be limited to firing a single bolt (the bonus action one) since you don't have one hand free to satisfy the requirements on the main attack.</p><p></p><p>So as you can see, the feat language intentionally allows you to fight with a hand crossbow even though both your hands are busy, but <em>only</em> if you use the hand crossbow in your off hand (=for your bonus action attack). Not coincidentally, this is how the archetype is presented! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CapnZapp, post: 7230380, member: 12731"] Short answer: "yes" :) Longer answer: My intent is for the Crossbow Expert to be able to fire one bolt with her action, then one more bolt with her bonus action. Total 2 bolts fired, sustained (=in any round). If you have found that my phrasing doesn't really support this RAI, I would be much obliged. So, yes, you can: Wield a rapier and a hand crossbow. A level 5 fighter would make two rapier attacks and one hand crossbow attack. Each round. This is comparable to two-weapon fighting. You can wield one hand crossbow. The fighter would make only two hand crossbow attacks, one with your action, a second with your bonus action. The loading of the action attack is taken care of the general rule that you load ammunition as part of your attack; the loading of the bonus action attack is (redundantly, though I know vonklaude has a differing opinion here) taken care of the phrasing of the Crossbow Expert language. You [I]can[/I] wield two hand crossbows. This would leave you with one unloaded hand crossbow after your turn though, since you have no hand free to reload the first one. The bonus attack one is taken care of the phrasing of the feat, but not the attack one. [I]The key is that the feat langauge voids the "hand free" part, as opposed to the "load is free as part of attack" part.[/I] You could go hand crossbow plus shield, but again, after the first round your h-X-bow would be empty. In the second round, you would be limited to firing a single bolt (the bonus action one) since you don't have one hand free to satisfy the requirements on the main attack. So as you can see, the feat language intentionally allows you to fight with a hand crossbow even though both your hands are busy, but [I]only[/I] if you use the hand crossbow in your off hand (=for your bonus action attack). Not coincidentally, this is how the archetype is presented! :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crossbow Expert redux
Top