Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Isida Kep'Tukari" data-source="post: 3011693" data-attributes="member: 4441">I would like to put forward a friendly arguement Eva.&nbsp; You wish the AU spellcasters to have all their healing spells to be exotic.&nbsp; However, most of the AU healing spells are, pound for pound, less powerful than the regular D&amp;D spells.&nbsp; Lesser battle healing is a 2nd level spell that does 1d6 + 1 point per level (up to +10) of healing.&nbsp; Greater battle healing is a 5th level spell that does 1d6 per caster level, up to 15d6.&nbsp; Those are far less powerful than any of the cure wounds.&nbsp; The transfer wounds spells are even less powerful, having a lower level cap and leaving either the caster (if self-cast) or the recipient with some subdual damage.&nbsp; No one in this campaign will be able to do more than lesser transfer wounds or lesser battle healing.Death and dying are much more likely in AU/AE, and recovering from fights is tougher.&nbsp; Returning from the dead is extremely difficult in AU/AE magic.&nbsp; I would like to request that AU/AE casters be allowed to keep what healing spells they may have at the levels and complexity given.&nbsp; Even a magister would not be too much different than, say, a sorcerer attempting a UMD on a clerical wand.&nbsp; It's a small perk, arcane casters being able to heal, but I would argue that it would not be game breaking to allow AU/AE casters to do it within their own spellcasting system.I know I am overstating my case, but I wanted to make my arguement clear.&nbsp; I have no problem with going with the AU/AE healing spells as exotic if necessary, I just wanted to let my feelings and arguements on the subject be known.&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Isida Kep'Tukari, post: 3011693, member: 4441"] I would like to put forward a friendly arguement Eva. You wish the AU spellcasters to have all their healing spells to be exotic. However, most of the AU healing spells are, pound for pound, less powerful than the regular D&D spells. [I]Lesser battle healing[/I] is a 2nd level spell that does 1d6 + 1 point per level (up to +10) of healing. [I]Greater battle healing[/I] is a 5th level spell that does 1d6 per caster level, up to 15d6. Those are far less powerful than any of the [i]cure wounds[/i]. The [i]transfer wounds[/i] spells are even less powerful, having a lower level cap and leaving either the caster (if self-cast) or the recipient with some subdual damage. No one in this campaign will be able to do more than [i]lesser transfer wounds[/i] or [i]lesser battle healing[/i]. Death and dying are much more likely in AU/AE, and recovering from fights is tougher. Returning from the dead is extremely difficult in AU/AE magic. I would like to request that AU/AE casters be allowed to keep what healing spells they may have at the levels and complexity given. Even a magister would not be too much different than, say, a sorcerer attempting a UMD on a clerical wand. It's a small perk, arcane casters being able to heal, but I would argue that it would not be game breaking to allow AU/AE casters to do it within their own spellcasting system. I know I am overstating my case, but I wanted to make my arguement clear. I have no problem with going with the AU/AE healing spells as exotic if necessary, I just wanted to let my feelings and arguements on the subject be known. :) [/QUOTE]

Verification