Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crystal Ball: A year in, how do you think 5E will unfold going forward?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester David" data-source="post: 6623082" data-attributes="member: 37579"><p>Option C) Wishful thinking. </p><p>Possibly with a dash of denial. </p><p></p><p>They've been working on the OGL for over a year now. They would have started that before the playtest ended and the product was finalized. They likely wanted it to be done around the same time as the core rules, possibly even the PHB. Heck, they could have started work on it when they began work on 5e, waaaay back in 2011. It's not like they need to playtest the OGL or make it specific to the final version of the rules.</p><p></p><p>The fact it's been almost a year since the books were released and they aren't even willing to discuss the probably contents albeit without details (like Mearls repeatedly said they would do last year) means it's likely very much still in flux. They're "working on it" either means they're still fighting over the contents or a legal department is dragging their heels like crazy. But the latter would explain a delay of a month or two. A couple months after the DMG, maybe a third catching up after the holidays. It doesn't explain 4-5 months after the DMG was finished. </p><p></p><p>The fact of the matter is the legal details are NOT that hard. They have the framework for two licences already written. The hard part is already done. It'd be easy to copy the original, revise a few terms where needed to protect the IP and prevent another Pathfinder. And they've had years to go over the problems with the OGL and GSL. This is a project that should take a week, not years. IF it was even remotely a priority. </p><p>So the problem is elsewhere, either internally at WotC or at Hasbro. If it was something they could compromise on or talk through they would have done so months ago.</p><p></p><p>Mearls is likely just being optimistic. Walking into meetings like we walk into edition war arguments thinking "I've got this now. This time when I present my case and argue my point they'll all agree with me." Still hoping he can win and get the OGL he wants out. But it doesn't work out like that. So the licence just sits there doing nobody any good.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester David, post: 6623082, member: 37579"] Option C) Wishful thinking. Possibly with a dash of denial. They've been working on the OGL for over a year now. They would have started that before the playtest ended and the product was finalized. They likely wanted it to be done around the same time as the core rules, possibly even the PHB. Heck, they could have started work on it when they began work on 5e, waaaay back in 2011. It's not like they need to playtest the OGL or make it specific to the final version of the rules. The fact it's been almost a year since the books were released and they aren't even willing to discuss the probably contents albeit without details (like Mearls repeatedly said they would do last year) means it's likely very much still in flux. They're "working on it" either means they're still fighting over the contents or a legal department is dragging their heels like crazy. But the latter would explain a delay of a month or two. A couple months after the DMG, maybe a third catching up after the holidays. It doesn't explain 4-5 months after the DMG was finished. The fact of the matter is the legal details are NOT that hard. They have the framework for two licences already written. The hard part is already done. It'd be easy to copy the original, revise a few terms where needed to protect the IP and prevent another Pathfinder. And they've had years to go over the problems with the OGL and GSL. This is a project that should take a week, not years. IF it was even remotely a priority. So the problem is elsewhere, either internally at WotC or at Hasbro. If it was something they could compromise on or talk through they would have done so months ago. Mearls is likely just being optimistic. Walking into meetings like we walk into edition war arguments thinking "I've got this now. This time when I present my case and argue my point they'll all agree with me." Still hoping he can win and get the OGL he wants out. But it doesn't work out like that. So the licence just sits there doing nobody any good. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Crystal Ball: A year in, how do you think 5E will unfold going forward?
Top