Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MaxKaladin" data-source="post: 1563005" data-attributes="member: 1196">Agreed!&nbsp; I do watch CSI:M, but find Caine to be too arrogant and self-righteous and he gets too emotionally involved in the cases.&nbsp; I much prefer Grissom.&nbsp; He does his level best to remain objective and uninvolved.&nbsp; While Caine might be more comforting to a victim of a crime, if I were an innocent person accused of a crime I'd want Grissom to be the CSI on the case.&nbsp; A sentiment someone once expressed to me about the two characters -- and one I agree with -- is that Grissom does not prejudge the case but rather studies the evidence and sees where it leads him while Caine decides fairly early on who he thinks is guilty and then tries to find evidence to fit his hypothesis.&nbsp; This week's CSI was a decent example of this.&nbsp; Some adult movie star was murdered.&nbsp; Caine decided early on that he didn't like the owner of the company that made and distributed her films (a moral objection was implied) and spent much of the episode trying to pin the murder on the guy only for it to turn out that he wasn't involved in the crime at all.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MaxKaladin, post: 1563005, member: 1196"] Agreed! I do watch CSI:M, but find Caine to be too arrogant and self-righteous and he gets too emotionally involved in the cases. I much prefer Grissom. He does his level best to remain objective and uninvolved. While Caine might be more comforting to a victim of a crime, if I were an innocent person accused of a crime I'd want Grissom to be the CSI on the case. A sentiment someone once expressed to me about the two characters -- and one I agree with -- is that Grissom does not prejudge the case but rather studies the evidence and sees where it leads him while Caine decides fairly early on who he thinks is guilty and then tries to find evidence to fit his hypothesis. This week's CSI was a decent example of this. Some adult movie star was murdered. Caine decided early on that he didn't like the owner of the company that made and distributed her films (a moral objection was implied) and spent much of the episode trying to pin the murder on the guy only for it to turn out that he wasn't involved in the crime at all. [/QUOTE]

Verification