Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Cultural Appropriation in role-playing games (draft)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6705484" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>I don't think a single person here suggests otherwise. We simply disagree with what counts as "some amount".</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. Now, reread the thread, and note how that the only person who has suggested we take that idea flatly was Grumpy, and when we pointed out some of the problems, he changed it. Here you are seemingly trying to tell us we shouldn't discuss the topic, and here we are, using discussion of the topic to bring out some amount of moderation of an extreme position. Which of us is being more constructive?</p><p></p><p>There is a musical, "1776", in which one of the founding fathers (Stephen Hopkins, of Rhode Island) notes: "Well, in all my years I ain't never heard, seen nor smelled an issue that was so dangerous it couldn't be talked about. " While the historical man may not have said those words, the sentiment has value. We can't even *talk* about it?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Okay. Fine. You don't think it has value. We got that. </p><p></p><p>But, you live in a world where others do think it is valid, and has value. So, you're probably going to have to learn to live with it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The only freezing of the dialog I've seen has come from your attempt to reject the term. The rest of us seemed to be doing just fine. Grumpy came here looking for feedback, we gave it, and he actually took some of it. Not all, but some. That's not "frozen". That motion. You're the only one stuck in place.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, but dude, if they don't at least occasionally bludgeon those in the privileged classes over the head, nothing *happens*. If folks are gentle, kind, appeasing to your sensibilities, there's little motive to change. I think history will show you that advancement on issues of racism, sexism, and other civil rights and equality always come at the price of someone feeling pretty darned uncomfortable.</p><p></p><p>Monte Cook didn't find a good way to present his content until he was bludgeoned over the head with the error. Betcha he won't make that mistake again!</p><p></p><p>So, yes, we get bludgeoned with it. We are made to feel guilty, ashamed, put upon when we feel we are innocent. Guess what? If we are worth what we think we are, we can handle it. A bit of humble pie can be good for us.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Interestingly, apple pie and fried chicken are *not* American. You can find them in Italian 15th century cookbooks, among other European sources, with virtually the same recipes. What we think of apple pie today is really... German, brought by the Pennsylvania Dutch.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Tell that to Apple. They have active look and feel suits going over cellphone design as we speak.</p><p></p><p>Mind you, I must say (again, and so I put it in big letters so that I'm clear): <em> I WAS NOT SUGGESTING WE LITERALLY USE COPYRIGHT LAW FOR THIS.</em></p><p></p><p>It was merely the handy example of, "someone else created it, and you took it, and we already accept that can be problematic". That's all. That's as far as it goes. You have spent many paragraphs (stalling the conversation, btw) on a strawman.</p><p></p><p>I don't actually expect that point to get through, though. One of the major issues with such discussions is that, if someone is confronted with that which they don't believe, they usually dig in and double-down on their commitment. So, I don't actually expect you, personally, will accept a single thing I've said here. With this post, I'm no longer trying to convince you, and I owe it to you to be honest about that.</p><p></p><p>Some other reader, however, who isn't invested in the position, might see the point, and take it to heart.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6705484, member: 177"] I don't think a single person here suggests otherwise. We simply disagree with what counts as "some amount". Yes. Now, reread the thread, and note how that the only person who has suggested we take that idea flatly was Grumpy, and when we pointed out some of the problems, he changed it. Here you are seemingly trying to tell us we shouldn't discuss the topic, and here we are, using discussion of the topic to bring out some amount of moderation of an extreme position. Which of us is being more constructive? There is a musical, "1776", in which one of the founding fathers (Stephen Hopkins, of Rhode Island) notes: "Well, in all my years I ain't never heard, seen nor smelled an issue that was so dangerous it couldn't be talked about. " While the historical man may not have said those words, the sentiment has value. We can't even *talk* about it? Okay. Fine. You don't think it has value. We got that. But, you live in a world where others do think it is valid, and has value. So, you're probably going to have to learn to live with it. The only freezing of the dialog I've seen has come from your attempt to reject the term. The rest of us seemed to be doing just fine. Grumpy came here looking for feedback, we gave it, and he actually took some of it. Not all, but some. That's not "frozen". That motion. You're the only one stuck in place. Yeah, but dude, if they don't at least occasionally bludgeon those in the privileged classes over the head, nothing *happens*. If folks are gentle, kind, appeasing to your sensibilities, there's little motive to change. I think history will show you that advancement on issues of racism, sexism, and other civil rights and equality always come at the price of someone feeling pretty darned uncomfortable. Monte Cook didn't find a good way to present his content until he was bludgeoned over the head with the error. Betcha he won't make that mistake again! So, yes, we get bludgeoned with it. We are made to feel guilty, ashamed, put upon when we feel we are innocent. Guess what? If we are worth what we think we are, we can handle it. A bit of humble pie can be good for us. Interestingly, apple pie and fried chicken are *not* American. You can find them in Italian 15th century cookbooks, among other European sources, with virtually the same recipes. What we think of apple pie today is really... German, brought by the Pennsylvania Dutch. Tell that to Apple. They have active look and feel suits going over cellphone design as we speak. Mind you, I must say (again, and so I put it in big letters so that I'm clear): [i] I WAS NOT SUGGESTING WE LITERALLY USE COPYRIGHT LAW FOR THIS.[/i] It was merely the handy example of, "someone else created it, and you took it, and we already accept that can be problematic". That's all. That's as far as it goes. You have spent many paragraphs (stalling the conversation, btw) on a strawman. I don't actually expect that point to get through, though. One of the major issues with such discussions is that, if someone is confronted with that which they don't believe, they usually dig in and double-down on their commitment. So, I don't actually expect you, personally, will accept a single thing I've said here. With this post, I'm no longer trying to convince you, and I owe it to you to be honest about that. Some other reader, however, who isn't invested in the position, might see the point, and take it to heart. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Cultural Appropriation in role-playing games (draft)
Top