Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Cultural Appropriation in role-playing games (draft)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 6706066" data-attributes="member: 177"><p>Gentlemen, I'm sorry, but you are guilty of a logical fallacy - the "tone argument" (also known as "tone policing") in which a position is dismissed based on its presentation. It is a variant of the more formal "Appeal to Emotion".</p><p></p><p><a href="http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Tone_argument" target="_blank">http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Tone_argument</a></p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion" target="_blank">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion</a></p><p></p><p>The logical content of the idea is *separate* from how it is used. You can't dismiss the concept of cultural appropriation because it is used as a bludgeon, any more than you can outlaw kitchen knives because they occasionally cut people - veggies still need to be chopped, and all. Quite simply - the fact that it is used to make you feel bad does not mean it is inaccurate or incorrect! </p><p></p><p>In a very basic way, if you (meaning dominant culture, not you personally) have been walking roughshod over others, the defense, "But you should be *nice* to me!" carries darned little weight. You (we, really) get bludgeoned in large part because we are responsible* for making things better, and are generally falling down on the job. </p><p></p><p>Now, we can have a discussion of tone, in terms of what strategies are best for reaching an audience. I made some comments to just that early in the thread, in my feedback to Grumpy. However, that doesn't touch the basic validity (or lack thereof) of the position. To conflate them is basically saying, 'I don't think we should talk about that topic, as it makes me uncomfortable." As I noted before - there *will* be unpleasant feelings here. This is hard, and a big humble pill we need to swallow. But the side effects to us are not the central issue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>*In saying this, I note the difference between being "responsible" and being "accountable". We, as individuals, may be largely innocent of the major sins, but it falls in our laps to help make things better, regardless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Umbran, post: 6706066, member: 177"] Gentlemen, I'm sorry, but you are guilty of a logical fallacy - the "tone argument" (also known as "tone policing") in which a position is dismissed based on its presentation. It is a variant of the more formal "Appeal to Emotion". [url]http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Tone_argument[/url] [url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion[/url] The logical content of the idea is *separate* from how it is used. You can't dismiss the concept of cultural appropriation because it is used as a bludgeon, any more than you can outlaw kitchen knives because they occasionally cut people - veggies still need to be chopped, and all. Quite simply - the fact that it is used to make you feel bad does not mean it is inaccurate or incorrect! In a very basic way, if you (meaning dominant culture, not you personally) have been walking roughshod over others, the defense, "But you should be *nice* to me!" carries darned little weight. You (we, really) get bludgeoned in large part because we are responsible* for making things better, and are generally falling down on the job. Now, we can have a discussion of tone, in terms of what strategies are best for reaching an audience. I made some comments to just that early in the thread, in my feedback to Grumpy. However, that doesn't touch the basic validity (or lack thereof) of the position. To conflate them is basically saying, 'I don't think we should talk about that topic, as it makes me uncomfortable." As I noted before - there *will* be unpleasant feelings here. This is hard, and a big humble pill we need to swallow. But the side effects to us are not the central issue. *In saying this, I note the difference between being "responsible" and being "accountable". We, as individuals, may be largely innocent of the major sins, but it falls in our laps to help make things better, regardless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Cultural Appropriation in role-playing games (draft)
Top