Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Fighter1" data-source="post: 2788821" data-attributes="member: 39381">The “rant” is not about multiclassing; it is the abuse thereof. The rules do not limit it (besides favored classes; but that is not a limit just a punitive repercussion). Thus; since the rules do not limit it and many folks feel that players get out of hand with it; a logic is applied to curb it to a extent. Note that I made little or no mention of core classes.You made my point; IMO I do not believe that a, Druid for example, should be able to exlempifly a major ability then turn around and do it again. If he is a Druid that chooses to focus on wild shaping versus other disciplines of his class then so be it; but he cannot focus more than that in my game.In addition you noted “organizations” and PrC’s; if you read the books in full you will see that most actually are associated with an organization or special factor that demands adherence of some sort. The only ones I can think of off the top of my head that is not are the ones out of the DMG.To note; if my players really got that ticked about it they would tell me. As it stands now they all actually agree wholeheartedly; they are not munchkins.The last two levels; why does a PrC make more sense there? That is opinion and speculation not a statement of “absolute”.Your sort of making the point of the thread here now…and contradicting yourself.This is a viable option however now what you end up with is possible conflicts with the players; and perhaps even issues later if the campaign changes for some reason. You are using a subjective analysis on something that IMO would be better served with a logical house rule that equally covers everything (as in the quote you cite from me above)</blockquote>

Verification