Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Curbing Multi-classing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fighter1" data-source="post: 2791692" data-attributes="member: 39381"><p>Yes…ok…the RAW also says “It’s your game”</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In my mind; that Halfling would be unacceptable</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No one said anything about re-writing the books; this thread is about opinions on the subject of multi-classing. And yes my arguments are very thematic with some mechanical aspects; but mostly thematic.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I like that perception myself; there are those classes that, if you wish to be part of it, you must sacrifice certain things. Alignment for any PC is sort of the same thing; you wanna be Chaotic Neutral then you should act that way.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And fundamentally this is where we disagree; the rest is just dressing. And this is each our own opinion and likeing.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Note; I tried to make this clear and apparently I failed – I do not restrict Core Classes form the Core books at all; and Core Classes form other books I accept on a case by case basis (such as the Scout and Hexblade)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That is obvious; I did not consider it relevant at the time.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes it is</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You could – but again that is not the core reason why I am against “over multi-classing” at all. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Because the “organizational side” is NOT the only reason just a reason to validate my own opinion to myself.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In the example above which I have never seen nor heard of; that does indeed make sense to an extent. However in such an organization where players wanted to take multiple PrC’s from the same organization I would have a minimum class level before they could take a second; as my idea would be to ensure the PC “mastered” or became and expert at their original function before taking on a new one. In addition some PrC’s maybe at odds with the other; making mixing certain ones difficult at best. This is Just my preference. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Calling who names – that was intended as a statement that my players do not munchkinize. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>I bolded the last sentence - Did I say that? Did I elude to that? Did I say anything even relating to that? No I did not. Taking things out of context…that is immature and plain silly. You had best apply that to yourself to be honest - I do find it irritating when people look wording they can take out of context just to attempt top back up their point; your points are made already; this is juvenile. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again: I do find it irritating when people look wording they can take out of context just to attempt top back up their point; your points are made already; this is juvenile. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And yes – that is my ruling. If you choose the PrC and have level or power issues later; tough. That is an opinion and a preference of my own; obviously not yours. But then again I am of a different religion apparently.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again; we differ based upon subjective perceptions and thus will never agree.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again; we differ based upon subjective perceptions and thus will never agree.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Perhaps not in your mind – in mine it does.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, really? Is that not what this thread proves?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fighter1, post: 2791692, member: 39381"] Yes…ok…the RAW also says “It’s your game” In my mind; that Halfling would be unacceptable No one said anything about re-writing the books; this thread is about opinions on the subject of multi-classing. And yes my arguments are very thematic with some mechanical aspects; but mostly thematic. I like that perception myself; there are those classes that, if you wish to be part of it, you must sacrifice certain things. Alignment for any PC is sort of the same thing; you wanna be Chaotic Neutral then you should act that way. And fundamentally this is where we disagree; the rest is just dressing. And this is each our own opinion and likeing. Note; I tried to make this clear and apparently I failed – I do not restrict Core Classes form the Core books at all; and Core Classes form other books I accept on a case by case basis (such as the Scout and Hexblade) That is obvious; I did not consider it relevant at the time. Yes it is You could – but again that is not the core reason why I am against “over multi-classing” at all. Because the “organizational side” is NOT the only reason just a reason to validate my own opinion to myself. In the example above which I have never seen nor heard of; that does indeed make sense to an extent. However in such an organization where players wanted to take multiple PrC’s from the same organization I would have a minimum class level before they could take a second; as my idea would be to ensure the PC “mastered” or became and expert at their original function before taking on a new one. In addition some PrC’s maybe at odds with the other; making mixing certain ones difficult at best. This is Just my preference. Calling who names – that was intended as a statement that my players do not munchkinize. I bolded the last sentence - Did I say that? Did I elude to that? Did I say anything even relating to that? No I did not. Taking things out of context…that is immature and plain silly. You had best apply that to yourself to be honest - I do find it irritating when people look wording they can take out of context just to attempt top back up their point; your points are made already; this is juvenile. Again: I do find it irritating when people look wording they can take out of context just to attempt top back up their point; your points are made already; this is juvenile. And yes – that is my ruling. If you choose the PrC and have level or power issues later; tough. That is an opinion and a preference of my own; obviously not yours. But then again I am of a different religion apparently. Again; we differ based upon subjective perceptions and thus will never agree. Again; we differ based upon subjective perceptions and thus will never agree. Perhaps not in your mind – in mine it does. No, really? Is that not what this thread proves? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Curbing Multi-classing
Top