Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cure Light Wounds: Nearly Useless?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 4332636" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>Using your statistics, 60% of monsters have attacks that do not target AC.</p><p></p><p>If those non-AC attacks are used 100% of the time by 100% those monsters, then 60% or less of all attacks are not affected by Shield of Faith.</p><p></p><p>Dropping that extreme improbability from 60% to < 50% is not a big of a stretch. The designers did not give monsters AC attack options for them to not ever be used. And in fact, using your statistics, only 49% of heroic monsters are capable of using against defense attacks (which is <50%). In non-heroic campaigns, there are more ways to boost healing than there are to boost AC, so my point still stands.</p><p></p><p>Even if 60% of all attacks are not against AC, Shield of Faith STILL prevents a lot more damage on average than Cure Light Wounds ever cures because CLW effectively negates one+ hit 100% of the time (and at high level, less than that) once per day (assuming that the target didn't die or or didn't get smoked for even more damage due to a condition or didn't lose a lot of combat actions due to a condition), and Shield of Faith negates ~20% of hits and any condition damage that hit would do (50% chance to hit drops to 40%) 40+% of the time for many attacks against many PCs once per day. If there are more than 12 total attacks for all of the NPCs in an entire encounter combined (on average), Shield of Faith is better (and that's just taking into account damage, not monster attack condition protection).</p><p></p><p>Since it will almost definitely be <60% of all monster attacks in most campaigns, Shield of Faith is even better.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Plus, the user of Shield of Faith does not need to use it on an average encounter. He can use it on encounters where it helps more (such as minion attacks or attacks by creatures that prefer vs. AC melee or ranged attacks).</p><p></p><p></p><p>The only one being misleading here is you. You use words like misleading and false and dishonest a lot in posts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 4332636, member: 2011"] Using your statistics, 60% of monsters have attacks that do not target AC. If those non-AC attacks are used 100% of the time by 100% those monsters, then 60% or less of all attacks are not affected by Shield of Faith. Dropping that extreme improbability from 60% to < 50% is not a big of a stretch. The designers did not give monsters AC attack options for them to not ever be used. And in fact, using your statistics, only 49% of heroic monsters are capable of using against defense attacks (which is <50%). In non-heroic campaigns, there are more ways to boost healing than there are to boost AC, so my point still stands. Even if 60% of all attacks are not against AC, Shield of Faith STILL prevents a lot more damage on average than Cure Light Wounds ever cures because CLW effectively negates one+ hit 100% of the time (and at high level, less than that) once per day (assuming that the target didn't die or or didn't get smoked for even more damage due to a condition or didn't lose a lot of combat actions due to a condition), and Shield of Faith negates ~20% of hits and any condition damage that hit would do (50% chance to hit drops to 40%) 40+% of the time for many attacks against many PCs once per day. If there are more than 12 total attacks for all of the NPCs in an entire encounter combined (on average), Shield of Faith is better (and that's just taking into account damage, not monster attack condition protection). Since it will almost definitely be <60% of all monster attacks in most campaigns, Shield of Faith is even better. Plus, the user of Shield of Faith does not need to use it on an average encounter. He can use it on encounters where it helps more (such as minion attacks or attacks by creatures that prefer vs. AC melee or ranged attacks). The only one being misleading here is you. You use words like misleading and false and dishonest a lot in posts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Cure Light Wounds: Nearly Useless?
Top