Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Minigiant" data-source="post: 6644809" data-attributes="member: 63508">I agree that bless boosts a GWM fighter a lot more than a rogue or nonGWM fighter.I disagree that is is a problem. The other players choose not to use the options.the non striker rogue is a non striker so I don't care about him. When the DM spawns a trap or lock, he'll shine. The nonGWM fighter with a great sword has other features too or playing suboptimal. No sympathy there. If he's a dwarf, I'll put some kobolds with poisoned javelins in so they have fun.It is like 4th edition fighters. People wanted to play them as strikers. They weren't primary striker, striking was secondary. That's not a flaw of the game. Those people didn't understand it and fighters could deal decent damage if need be.Also if the players use options, it is important that the DM does so to if the player choose not to handicap themselves. I don't run into the problem as my DM and when I DM, we use customization options to match the players. I fixed twf warriors without changing any feats by increases the effectiveness of mobs.IGA DM has any issue, he or she should find the cause and fix it.But a personal issue is not a technical issue. I want rangers to get protection style., doesn't mean something is wrong with rangers</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Minigiant, post: 6644809, member: 63508"] I agree that bless boosts a GWM fighter a lot more than a rogue or nonGWM fighter. I disagree that is is a problem. The other players choose not to use the options.the non striker rogue is a non striker so I don't care about him. When the DM spawns a trap or lock, he'll shine. The nonGWM fighter with a great sword has other features too or playing suboptimal. No sympathy there. If he's a dwarf, I'll put some kobolds with poisoned javelins in so they have fun. It is like 4th edition fighters. People wanted to play them as strikers. They weren't primary striker, striking was secondary. That's not a flaw of the game. Those people didn't understand it and fighters could deal decent damage if need be. Also if the players use options, it is important that the DM does so to if the player choose not to handicap themselves. I don't run into the problem as my DM and when I DM, we use customization options to match the players. I fixed twf warriors without changing any feats by increases the effectiveness of mobs. IGA DM has any issue, he or she should find the cause and fix it. But a personal issue is not a technical issue. I want rangers to get protection style., doesn't mean something is wrong with rangers [/QUOTE]

Verification