Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Curse of Strahd: alternative exits?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7131060" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Absolutely true... and it results in a slight disconnect between the "campaign setting" of the Baratok Valley and the actual I6 module within the book. Because they kept most of I6 as-is within CoS, the main story stays as "find out Strahd is a vampire and that he is responsible for the PC's predicament and if you want to leave you have to kill him". And all the explanations from I6 of why the PCs are there remain the same as the original module. But that also means that everything else in the valley isn't actually important to that story and really is kind of extraneous. It's only all there really just to allow a DM to bring PCs into Barovia at a much lower level than they otherwise would be and to give them other "non-main-story" things to do until they reach the level to jump back onto the "Strahd is responsible, go kill him!" plot.</p><p></p><p>Had this been an "autumn release" book wherein a much more original storyline was created only just with elements to familiar products of the past... that main Strahd story thrust probably wouldn't be there so heavily and a more organic reason for being here and multiple methods for escape would be given . But instead, because it was a spring release it very much has a feel of "easier and less time-consuming product to produce" that we've now gotten from both CoS and TofYP. Which I suspect is why I6 was mainly incorporated as-is, and all the other stuff in the valley was added just as "filler" for lack of a better term (although that has much more a of a negative connotation as I really should give it, as I find all this extra stuff absolutely wonderful and a great addition to the book.)</p><p></p><p>But it just means that each individual DM has to do more work to truly make CoS their own, in whatever manner or style they wish to run it. But of course, based upon the long <u>Enhancing Curse of Strahd </u>thread, it seems like a lot of us not only don't mind doing that, but we find it much more enjoyable that we do put our own stamps on the book that way.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7131060, member: 7006"] Absolutely true... and it results in a slight disconnect between the "campaign setting" of the Baratok Valley and the actual I6 module within the book. Because they kept most of I6 as-is within CoS, the main story stays as "find out Strahd is a vampire and that he is responsible for the PC's predicament and if you want to leave you have to kill him". And all the explanations from I6 of why the PCs are there remain the same as the original module. But that also means that everything else in the valley isn't actually important to that story and really is kind of extraneous. It's only all there really just to allow a DM to bring PCs into Barovia at a much lower level than they otherwise would be and to give them other "non-main-story" things to do until they reach the level to jump back onto the "Strahd is responsible, go kill him!" plot. Had this been an "autumn release" book wherein a much more original storyline was created only just with elements to familiar products of the past... that main Strahd story thrust probably wouldn't be there so heavily and a more organic reason for being here and multiple methods for escape would be given . But instead, because it was a spring release it very much has a feel of "easier and less time-consuming product to produce" that we've now gotten from both CoS and TofYP. Which I suspect is why I6 was mainly incorporated as-is, and all the other stuff in the valley was added just as "filler" for lack of a better term (although that has much more a of a negative connotation as I really should give it, as I find all this extra stuff absolutely wonderful and a great addition to the book.) But it just means that each individual DM has to do more work to truly make CoS their own, in whatever manner or style they wish to run it. But of course, based upon the long [U]Enhancing Curse of Strahd [/U]thread, it seems like a lot of us not only don't mind doing that, but we find it much more enjoyable that we do put our own stamps on the book that way. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Curse of Strahd: alternative exits?
Top