Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Curse of Strahd spoiler-filled general discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hawkeyefan" data-source="post: 6854195" data-attributes="member: 6785785"><p>It's hard to say for sure. The Ring certainly seemed to exert more influence on its bearer when it wanted. Frodo's corruption is far quicker and more severe than Bilbo's. Is that because Sauron's strength is growing? Or is it because Frodo had to face Sauron's servants directly, and was wounded by them? Or did the Ring simply sense the objective of his mission and try to exert control to avoid destruction? Probably any...or all...of those factors can be sited as the reason.</p><p></p><p>Smaegol's fall was far quicker, and happened simply upon seeing the Ring. Was that because he was a worse person than Bilbo or Frodo? Maybe...we don't really know much about him, but he seemed a bit selfish. But would he have killed without the Ring? Very hard to say. I'd lean toward no, but that's pure conjecture. The Ring had been found and it immediately did what it needed to move on to where it wanted to be...and it used Smaegol to do it. </p><p></p><p>So I don't know if I'd attribute Bilbo's resistance to the Ring as anything more than the Ring being happy to remain where it was for a time. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I am not blaming the victim in any way. And I don't think I said anyone else was. Except perhaps in the analogy of "Tatyana = One Ring". My stance that that analogy doesn't work is because it is essentially blaming Tatyana, and that's not correct.</p><p></p><p>The way I will treat the backstory in my game is that all of this happened over time. None of it was sudden. When it comes to the exact order of events, I'm not really concerned about them because I doubt my players will be writing down every detail and trying to place them in chronological order. No, they'll get the broad strokes, and that will be more than enough.</p><p></p><p>I plan on going over the Amber Temple stuff again in more detail to decide how I want to handle that. Honestly the vestige bit and all that is what I find more concerning than the specific order of events in Strahd's fall. I'll have more comments about that once I give it a more thorough read.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hawkeyefan, post: 6854195, member: 6785785"] It's hard to say for sure. The Ring certainly seemed to exert more influence on its bearer when it wanted. Frodo's corruption is far quicker and more severe than Bilbo's. Is that because Sauron's strength is growing? Or is it because Frodo had to face Sauron's servants directly, and was wounded by them? Or did the Ring simply sense the objective of his mission and try to exert control to avoid destruction? Probably any...or all...of those factors can be sited as the reason. Smaegol's fall was far quicker, and happened simply upon seeing the Ring. Was that because he was a worse person than Bilbo or Frodo? Maybe...we don't really know much about him, but he seemed a bit selfish. But would he have killed without the Ring? Very hard to say. I'd lean toward no, but that's pure conjecture. The Ring had been found and it immediately did what it needed to move on to where it wanted to be...and it used Smaegol to do it. So I don't know if I'd attribute Bilbo's resistance to the Ring as anything more than the Ring being happy to remain where it was for a time. I am not blaming the victim in any way. And I don't think I said anyone else was. Except perhaps in the analogy of "Tatyana = One Ring". My stance that that analogy doesn't work is because it is essentially blaming Tatyana, and that's not correct. The way I will treat the backstory in my game is that all of this happened over time. None of it was sudden. When it comes to the exact order of events, I'm not really concerned about them because I doubt my players will be writing down every detail and trying to place them in chronological order. No, they'll get the broad strokes, and that will be more than enough. I plan on going over the Amber Temple stuff again in more detail to decide how I want to handle that. Honestly the vestige bit and all that is what I find more concerning than the specific order of events in Strahd's fall. I'll have more comments about that once I give it a more thorough read. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Curse of Strahd spoiler-filled general discussion
Top