Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Curse of Strahd spoiler-filled general discussion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 6928164" data-attributes="member: 9789"><p>Pffewf, that's a tough one. It fits the narrative just as well, but it leaves even fewer allies for the party, and no one with any real power who opposes Strahd in the land. I don't think I will personally use that one, just because it could start to feel too hopeless: it turns up the "everyone is out to get you" vibe to the point that the party might just stop trusting anyone. (I've been in those kinds of games.)</p><p></p><p>This narrative structure I would reject completely. It mixes excuses for Strahd's behavior with victim-blaming and comes up with a particularly nasty mix, especially as the entire game is more or less a metaphor for spousal abuse. This makes Strahd way too sympathetic and far less responsible for his actions, which is... way too much like every other story about an evil vampire, ever. It's beyond trope; it's stereotype. Strahd didn't conquer those lands for the people, or to keep anyone safe: he did it because he loves to conquer people, consolidate his power, and he's good at it. It's all about power and glory, which makes his inability to gain the attention of a woman even more frustrating to him: he can't conquer her (thanks to her pesky free will and his lack of any warmth or reason for her to like him) which infuriates him, especially as he is clearly someone used to bending everything in his path to his will. He doesn't damn his brother because he's jealous, or because other people like him: he damns him because he is an obstacle in his path to the object he desires to possess, just like anything else. Strahd doesn't love Tatyana; he wants to conquer and lord over her - which is much easier as a vampire, since you can remove someone's free will and force your way/vision/self onto them. That's what he loves about being a vampire: now he can also conquer people's souls as well as their lands and bodies.</p><p></p><p>The idea that he's upset because the villagers he worked so hard to save don't have the proper thanks for him just makes me throw up in my mouth a little. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Which isn't me saying it's a bad idea! It's just me saying I'd never use it. I feel like it goes entirely against the flow of the story.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 6928164, member: 9789"] Pffewf, that's a tough one. It fits the narrative just as well, but it leaves even fewer allies for the party, and no one with any real power who opposes Strahd in the land. I don't think I will personally use that one, just because it could start to feel too hopeless: it turns up the "everyone is out to get you" vibe to the point that the party might just stop trusting anyone. (I've been in those kinds of games.) This narrative structure I would reject completely. It mixes excuses for Strahd's behavior with victim-blaming and comes up with a particularly nasty mix, especially as the entire game is more or less a metaphor for spousal abuse. This makes Strahd way too sympathetic and far less responsible for his actions, which is... way too much like every other story about an evil vampire, ever. It's beyond trope; it's stereotype. Strahd didn't conquer those lands for the people, or to keep anyone safe: he did it because he loves to conquer people, consolidate his power, and he's good at it. It's all about power and glory, which makes his inability to gain the attention of a woman even more frustrating to him: he can't conquer her (thanks to her pesky free will and his lack of any warmth or reason for her to like him) which infuriates him, especially as he is clearly someone used to bending everything in his path to his will. He doesn't damn his brother because he's jealous, or because other people like him: he damns him because he is an obstacle in his path to the object he desires to possess, just like anything else. Strahd doesn't love Tatyana; he wants to conquer and lord over her - which is much easier as a vampire, since you can remove someone's free will and force your way/vision/self onto them. That's what he loves about being a vampire: now he can also conquer people's souls as well as their lands and bodies. The idea that he's upset because the villagers he worked so hard to save don't have the proper thanks for him just makes me throw up in my mouth a little. :) Which isn't me saying it's a bad idea! It's just me saying I'd never use it. I feel like it goes entirely against the flow of the story. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Curse of Strahd spoiler-filled general discussion
Top