Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Scion" data-source="post: 1427781" data-attributes="member: 5777">Personaly I would probably treat it like this:Guy wants to be good at intimidate but has a bad cha.He has lots of ranks in it, he tries to use it often.I would create a feat that had some prereq's (things like must have succeded at intimidating someone in situation x or whatever, and lots of ranks in intimidate, and require a cha of 9 or less). It would grant a +2 to intimidate checks, keep the negative cha modifier, and add on the str modifier as well to the check if it is obvious that the character will use it or has used it recently (that is why big bad guys have lackeys! to chop them up first and then say that the big guy is next.. or chop up a lackey buddy and tell the other he is next <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).That way he has paid the price, gets a very good benefit, and still keeps the game balance pretty well on track <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>