Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Custserv@wizards
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgsugden" data-source="post: 1289999" data-attributes="member: 2629"><p>I've been on a quest to get the polymorph/wildshape rules down correctly, as intended by the developers. It was important that I have a working system for a party that was comprised entirely of druids.</p><p></p><p>To that end, I have sent custserv a number of questions on polymorph. Each new set of emails began on a separate sub-issue of polymorph.</p><p></p><p>Each set of email answers I received contradicted each other on some really basic aspects of how polymorph works. Some of them showed a complete disregard for the 3.5 rules - as if the person answering the email had never even looked at the PHB.</p><p></p><p>In the legal industry, when a large set of documents needs to be shown to the 'enemy', there are a lot of rules that need to be applied to figure out which documents you can hold back and which documents must be given to your enemy. These rules are far from clear. They involve a lot of judgment calls. It takes some expertise to really do the job right and not give away too much or hold too much back.</p><p></p><p>When law firms prepare these 'productions' of documents, the people looking the documents over go through a process similar to the one that the WotC custserv people go through. They have a problem come before them, they apply the rules and then they determine the best answer that they can find.</p><p></p><p>In most large productions, a large number of people work on this process. When they come across difficult questions, they put together logs detailing the question that they faced, the answer they used and the reasoning for that answer. Those logs are put together into a single set of guidelines to make sure that the same rules are consistently applied throughout the entire process.</p><p></p><p>WotC should do the same darn thing. Collect the questions. Collect their answers. Collect their reasoning. Put it together in a sensible set of documents so that they can be consistent.</p><p></p><p>This isn't brain surgery. The process is very simple. A basic database program could handle it easily. Heck, they could make a private message board system to handle each issue. All they'd have to do is cut and paste from the emails they are sending out. </p><p></p><p>They have the people. They just lack the organization to do it right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgsugden, post: 1289999, member: 2629"] I've been on a quest to get the polymorph/wildshape rules down correctly, as intended by the developers. It was important that I have a working system for a party that was comprised entirely of druids. To that end, I have sent custserv a number of questions on polymorph. Each new set of emails began on a separate sub-issue of polymorph. Each set of email answers I received contradicted each other on some really basic aspects of how polymorph works. Some of them showed a complete disregard for the 3.5 rules - as if the person answering the email had never even looked at the PHB. In the legal industry, when a large set of documents needs to be shown to the 'enemy', there are a lot of rules that need to be applied to figure out which documents you can hold back and which documents must be given to your enemy. These rules are far from clear. They involve a lot of judgment calls. It takes some expertise to really do the job right and not give away too much or hold too much back. When law firms prepare these 'productions' of documents, the people looking the documents over go through a process similar to the one that the WotC custserv people go through. They have a problem come before them, they apply the rules and then they determine the best answer that they can find. In most large productions, a large number of people work on this process. When they come across difficult questions, they put together logs detailing the question that they faced, the answer they used and the reasoning for that answer. Those logs are put together into a single set of guidelines to make sure that the same rules are consistently applied throughout the entire process. WotC should do the same darn thing. Collect the questions. Collect their answers. Collect their reasoning. Put it together in a sensible set of documents so that they can be consistent. This isn't brain surgery. The process is very simple. A basic database program could handle it easily. Heck, they could make a private message board system to handle each issue. All they'd have to do is cut and paste from the emails they are sending out. They have the people. They just lack the organization to do it right. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Custserv@wizards
Top