Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Cypherblade's Zeitgeist campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cypherblade" data-source="post: 9802452" data-attributes="member: 7048389"><p><h3><span style="font-size: 15px">First Audit Report, I love Gen AI <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></span></h3><p>[spoiler]</p><h3><strong>RHC INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION</strong></h3><p></p><h3><strong>AUDIT REPORT – Inspector Staf Overflorijn</strong></h3><p></p><p><strong>Prepared by:</strong> Auditor Lauryn Cyneburg</p><p><strong>Department:</strong> RHC Internal Control & Integrity Oversight</p><p><strong>Subject:</strong> Professional Conduct Audit – Inspector Staf Overflorijn</p><p><strong>Date:</strong> Autumn 5, 500 A.O.V.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><h3><strong>1. Executive Summary</strong></h3><p>This audit evaluates the conduct, judgment, and reliability of Inspector <strong>Staf Overflorijn</strong> during recent operations.</p><p>Throughout the interview, Inspector Overflorijn demonstrated <strong>ideological rigidity</strong>, <strong>poor judgment</strong>, and <strong>a concerning lack of understanding of RHC standards and legal expectations</strong>.</p><p></p><p>His statements reveal a pattern of <strong>aggressive behavior</strong>, <strong>discriminatory attitudes</strong>, and <strong>improper reliance on another team member (Agent Ayleen)</strong> for both legal interpretation and moral direction.</p><p>Such tendencies place the RHC at reputational and operational risk.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p><strong>2. Conduct Toward Civilians and Use of Force</strong></p><p>Overflorijn described an incident involving a demonstration outside RHC headquarters in which he used force against an unarmed civilian. He admitted this action was <strong>not ordered by any superior</strong>, and attributed it to his personal judgment.</p><p></p><p>He expressed <strong>no remorse</strong>, stating that the newspaper coverage of such incidents is “nonsense,” and claiming—without evidence—that “the citizens would stand behind him.”</p><p>He dismissed concerns of excessive force by calling the press “a trash rag.”</p><p></p><p>His responses indicate:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Failure to follow de-escalation protocols</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Disregard for public perception and accountability</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Minimal respect for civilian rights</strong></li> </ul><p>He further stated that his intimidating reputation stems from being a “tough trainer,” which he appeared to consider a virtue.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p><strong>3. Attitude Toward Non-Risuri Individuals</strong></p><p></p><p>Inspector Overflorijn openly stated that non-Risuri individuals are “potential threats” and “almost certainly spies.”</p><p>He added that foreign residents “should leave their own customs behind” if they wish to remain.</p><p></p><p>Such statements show:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Xenophobic bias</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>An inability to treat foreign citizens or agents with impartiality</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Views incompatible with RHC’s international mandate</strong></li> </ul><p>He could not envision a scenario in which he would follow a lawful order from a Danoran superior—an outright contradiction of chain-of-command obligations.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p><strong>4. Loyalty and Priorities</strong></p><p></p><p>When asked whether he sees himself primarily as an RHC officer or a guardian of Risur, Overflorijn stated that Risur is “more important” because the RHC “has not existed that long.”</p><p>This indicates a problematic hierarchy of loyalties.</p><p></p><p>He further claimed that if a lawful order conflicted with his view of Risuri interests, “then the law is wrong,” suggesting:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>A willingness to disregard legal authority</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>An inability to operate within the constraints of statutory mandates</strong></li> </ul><p>His casual remark that he would “crush the skull” of a colleague who betrayed Risur raises <strong>severe concerns regarding violent tendencies</strong> and emotional regulation.</p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p><strong>5. Team Dynamics</strong></p><p></p><p>Overflorijn acknowledges that fellow team members criticize him for being “too harsh” and relying on an “iron fist.”</p><p>He delegates all “soft approaches” to Agent Felix, indicating <strong>poor adaptability</strong> and <strong>inflexibility in communication style</strong>.</p><p></p><p>He repeatedly deferred questions to Agent Ayleen, suggesting she “knows best.” This reliance demonstrates:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>A lack of independent decision-making</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Improper dependence on a peer instead of the chain of command</strong></li> </ul><p><strong>[HR][/HR]</strong></p><p><strong>6. Integrity Issues</strong></p><p>When questioned about missing Axis Island artifacts, Overflorijn accused colleagues of selling evidence or using it for personal components. These accusations were made:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Without evidence</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Without documentation</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Without having filed any official report</li> </ul><p>This behavior constitutes either <strong>knowledge of misconduct he failed to report</strong>, or <strong>reckless, unfounded accusations to deflect responsibility</strong>.</p><p>Both options raise serious integrity concerns.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p><strong>7. Assessment</strong></p><p></p><p>Across all topics, Inspector Overflorijn demonstrated:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Intolerance toward foreign nationals and foreign agents</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Improper and unilateral use of force</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Disregard for legal structures and accountability</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Aggressive rhetoric unbecoming of an RHC officer</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Problematic personal ideology overshadowing professional duties</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Poor judgment in situations involving civilians</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Lack of emotional restraint</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Inconsistent and unreliable statements</strong></li> </ul><p>His attitude conflicts with the expectations of an RHC Inspector, especially one operating within a diverse, diplomatically sensitive environment.</p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p><strong>8. Recommendation</strong></p><p>Due to the severity of the concerns raised, the Internal Affairs Division recommends:</p><p></p><h4><strong>Immediate demotion of Inspector Staf Overflorijn to Assistant Inspector.</strong></h4><p></p><p>This demotion should be accompanied by:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Mandatory retraining</strong> in de-escalation, diplomacy, and legal procedure</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Six months of behavioral supervision</strong> under an assigned senior officer</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Quarterly performance reviews</strong></li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Reassessment of fitness for duty after the supervision period</strong></li> </ul><p></p><p>Should Overflorijn fail to demonstrate clear improvement, <strong>termination of service</strong> should be formally considered.</p><h3></h3><p>[/spoiler]<h3></h3><h3></h3></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cypherblade, post: 9802452, member: 7048389"] [HEADING=2][SIZE=4]First Audit Report, I love Gen AI :)[/SIZE][/HEADING] [spoiler] [HEADING=2][B]RHC INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION[/B][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][B]AUDIT REPORT – Inspector Staf Overflorijn[/B][/HEADING] [B]Prepared by:[/B] Auditor Lauryn Cyneburg [B]Department:[/B] RHC Internal Control & Integrity Oversight [B]Subject:[/B] Professional Conduct Audit – Inspector Staf Overflorijn [B]Date:[/B] Autumn 5, 500 A.O.V. [HR][/HR] [HEADING=2][B]1. Executive Summary[/B][/HEADING] This audit evaluates the conduct, judgment, and reliability of Inspector [B]Staf Overflorijn[/B] during recent operations. Throughout the interview, Inspector Overflorijn demonstrated [B]ideological rigidity[/B], [B]poor judgment[/B], and [B]a concerning lack of understanding of RHC standards and legal expectations[/B]. His statements reveal a pattern of [B]aggressive behavior[/B], [B]discriminatory attitudes[/B], and [B]improper reliance on another team member (Agent Ayleen)[/B] for both legal interpretation and moral direction. Such tendencies place the RHC at reputational and operational risk. [HR][/HR] [B]2. Conduct Toward Civilians and Use of Force[/B] Overflorijn described an incident involving a demonstration outside RHC headquarters in which he used force against an unarmed civilian. He admitted this action was [B]not ordered by any superior[/B], and attributed it to his personal judgment. He expressed [B]no remorse[/B], stating that the newspaper coverage of such incidents is “nonsense,” and claiming—without evidence—that “the citizens would stand behind him.” He dismissed concerns of excessive force by calling the press “a trash rag.” His responses indicate: [LIST] [*][B]Failure to follow de-escalation protocols[/B] [*][B]Disregard for public perception and accountability[/B] [*][B]Minimal respect for civilian rights[/B] [/LIST] He further stated that his intimidating reputation stems from being a “tough trainer,” which he appeared to consider a virtue. [HR][/HR] [B]3. Attitude Toward Non-Risuri Individuals[/B] Inspector Overflorijn openly stated that non-Risuri individuals are “potential threats” and “almost certainly spies.” He added that foreign residents “should leave their own customs behind” if they wish to remain. Such statements show: [LIST] [*][B]Xenophobic bias[/B] [*][B]An inability to treat foreign citizens or agents with impartiality[/B] [*][B]Views incompatible with RHC’s international mandate[/B] [/LIST] He could not envision a scenario in which he would follow a lawful order from a Danoran superior—an outright contradiction of chain-of-command obligations. [HR][/HR] [B]4. Loyalty and Priorities[/B] When asked whether he sees himself primarily as an RHC officer or a guardian of Risur, Overflorijn stated that Risur is “more important” because the RHC “has not existed that long.” This indicates a problematic hierarchy of loyalties. He further claimed that if a lawful order conflicted with his view of Risuri interests, “then the law is wrong,” suggesting: [LIST] [*][B]A willingness to disregard legal authority[/B] [*][B]An inability to operate within the constraints of statutory mandates[/B] [/LIST] His casual remark that he would “crush the skull” of a colleague who betrayed Risur raises [B]severe concerns regarding violent tendencies[/B] and emotional regulation. [HR][/HR] [B]5. Team Dynamics[/B] Overflorijn acknowledges that fellow team members criticize him for being “too harsh” and relying on an “iron fist.” He delegates all “soft approaches” to Agent Felix, indicating [B]poor adaptability[/B] and [B]inflexibility in communication style[/B]. He repeatedly deferred questions to Agent Ayleen, suggesting she “knows best.” This reliance demonstrates: [LIST] [*][B]A lack of independent decision-making[/B] [*][B]Improper dependence on a peer instead of the chain of command[/B] [/LIST] [B][HR][/HR] 6. Integrity Issues[/B] When questioned about missing Axis Island artifacts, Overflorijn accused colleagues of selling evidence or using it for personal components. These accusations were made: [LIST] [*]Without evidence [*]Without documentation [*]Without having filed any official report [/LIST] This behavior constitutes either [B]knowledge of misconduct he failed to report[/B], or [B]reckless, unfounded accusations to deflect responsibility[/B]. Both options raise serious integrity concerns. [HR][/HR] [B]7. Assessment[/B] Across all topics, Inspector Overflorijn demonstrated: [LIST] [*][B]Intolerance toward foreign nationals and foreign agents[/B] [*][B]Improper and unilateral use of force[/B] [*][B]Disregard for legal structures and accountability[/B] [*][B]Aggressive rhetoric unbecoming of an RHC officer[/B] [*][B]Problematic personal ideology overshadowing professional duties[/B] [*][B]Poor judgment in situations involving civilians[/B] [*][B]Lack of emotional restraint[/B] [*][B]Inconsistent and unreliable statements[/B] [/LIST] His attitude conflicts with the expectations of an RHC Inspector, especially one operating within a diverse, diplomatically sensitive environment. [HR][/HR] [B]8. Recommendation[/B] Due to the severity of the concerns raised, the Internal Affairs Division recommends: [HEADING=3][B]Immediate demotion of Inspector Staf Overflorijn to Assistant Inspector.[/B][/HEADING] This demotion should be accompanied by: [LIST] [*][B]Mandatory retraining[/B] in de-escalation, diplomacy, and legal procedure [*][B]Six months of behavioral supervision[/B] under an assigned senior officer [*][B]Quarterly performance reviews[/B] [*][B]Reassessment of fitness for duty after the supervision period[/B] [/LIST] Should Overflorijn fail to demonstrate clear improvement, [B]termination of service[/B] should be formally considered. [HEADING=2][SIZE=2][/SIZE][/HEADING][/spoiler][HEADING=2][SIZE=2][/SIZE][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Cypherblade's Zeitgeist campaign
Top
