Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Cypherblade" data-source="post: 9814408" data-attributes="member: 7048389">I've been doing some one-on-one talks with the players as part of the audit.Staf's results:[spoiler]<h4>About Conduct and Language Use</h4>Question: “There have been complaints about your attitude toward Risuri citizens. Can you explain what happened during the protest here at the RHC, where you acted against the demonstrators?”Answer: There was a heavy protest and many demonstrators came across as aggressive to me. Ayleen had asked me to pull someone out of the crowd. The protesters didn’t listen and some even attacked me unarmed, which forced me to intervene.Question: “Is there a law that forbids protesting?”Answer: I don’t know exactly, and he points out that Ayleen is probably better informed about those regulations.Question: “Why do you take orders from Ayleen?”Answer: Because I am convinced that she usually knows best what needs to be done.Question: “Did Ayleen order you to strike the protester?”Answer: No, that was my own decision. Ayleen did not tell me to do that.Question: “There are complaints about your attitude toward non-Risuri citizens. Do you recognize this behavior?”Answer: Not really. For me there’s no problem as long as they’re not enemies of Risur and they adapt to our norms. They should set aside their own customs.Question: “Have you ever humiliated or threatened a detainee based on origin?”Answer: No, I’ve never done that.Question: “Are you aware that your behavior reflects on the RHC (and Risur) in the eyes of its citizens?”Answer: I believe my attitude projects a proper image.Question: “Suppose the newspaper runs the headline: ‘Citizen attacked by RHC without cause!’”Answer: I’d dismiss that as a trash paper. I also think many citizens would support me. Even Captain Thames Grimsley supports me.Question: “How do you explain that colleagues describe you as ‘intimidating’?”Answer: That comes from our training period. I was strict and gave extra drills, which they didn’t like. They called me tough back then.Question: “Do you think diplomacy and justice are compatible?”Answer: Sometimes, but sometimes an iron fist is simply necessary.[HR][/HR]<h4>About His Beliefs</h4>Question: “You have expressed criticism of Danor and Crisillyir on several occasions. Do you consider that appropriate?”Answer: Yes, of course, especially regarding Danor.Question: “Would you follow orders from a Danoran superior if the order was legitimate?”Answer: I can’t imagine that situation ever occurring.Question: “Do you consider foreign agents colleagues or potential threats?”Answer: I consider them potential threats. They are almost guaranteed to be spies.Question: “Do you agree that the RHC has an international mandate?”Answer: Yes, but that mandate mainly serves to defend Risuri interests abroad. The mission to Axis Island is a good example of that.(When confronted with the fact that this mission officially does not exist, he reacts visibly caught out.)Question: “Have you ever deliberately withheld information that might benefit a foreign party?”Answer: No, certainly not.Question: “How would you react if your team received orders that harm Risuri interests but are legal?”Answer: Then I think that law is wrong.[HR][/HR]<h4>About Team Conflicts</h4>Question: “Have you ever argued with others in your team about your attitude?”Answer: Yes. The others say that I am too harsh and that I use an iron fist. I leave the soft approach to Felix.Question: “Have you ever thought you’d be better off working alone?”Answer: No, we’re a very good team.Question: “Do you see yourself as a guardian of Risur… or as an agent of the RHC?”Answer: Both, but primarily as a guardian of Risur. The RHC hasn’t existed that long, so Risur is more important to me.[HR][/HR]<h4>About Loyalty</h4>Question: “You call yourself a patriot. What does that mean to you?”Answer: To me it means going to the extreme for Risur, even with your life if necessary.Question: “How far would your loyalty to Risur go if the RHC ordered you to do something you consider unjust?”Answer: That would be difficult, but I am hardened. In the army I also had to follow orders. An order is an order.Question: “Where is the boundary where obedience ends and treason begins?”Answer: Ayleen knows that better than I do — ask her. Her judgment weighs more for me than that of a superior.Question: “Would you ever betray a colleague if they dishonored Risur?”Answer: I find that hard to imagine…(After hesitation) Although, I could smash his skull if necessary.Question: “Do you think your promotion to Inspector was a mistake by the RHC?”Answer: It was a surprise, but I’m happy with it. I feel good in my role.[HR][/HR]<h4>Other Topics</h4>Question: “Reports about Axis Island mention several artifacts (medallions). How is it that these cannot be found in the archive?”Answer: I know of one medallion with an earth elemental. I think Felix or Ayleen sold it or used it for components. You should really ask Ayleen.Question: “Do you believe the RHC provides its inspectors with sufficient resources for their missions?”Answer: Yes, absolutely.[HR][/HR]<h3>Audit Report – Inspector Staf Overflorijn</h3>Prepared by: Director Lauryn CyneburgDepartment: RHC Internal Control and Integrity Oversight / SlateSubject: Evaluation of professional conduct, integrity, and suitability of Inspector Staf OverflorijnDate: 5 Autumn 500 AOV<h3>1. Summary</h3>During the interview, Inspector Staf Overflorijn displayed a pattern of unprofessional behavior, ideological bias, and a poor understanding of his role within the RHC. His statements were often evasive, inconsistent, or openly at odds with the organization’s values.Overall, this paints the picture of an agent who acts more from personal conviction than from ethical or legal obligations.<h3>2. Analysis of Conduct and Attitude</h3>Staf demonstrates a heavy-handed and hostile approach, openly admitting to having struck citizens without an order from a superior. He also acknowledges that he dismisses the press, public perception, and complaint procedures.His attitude toward both Risuri and non-Risuri citizens is discriminatory, with statements implying that some citizens should “leave their customs behind.”This is clearly in conflict with the values of the RHC.When asked about relevant legislation, he prefers to defer to colleagues rather than take responsibility for his own knowledge.His belief that diplomacy is sometimes subordinate to an “iron fist” is concerning and shows insufficient grasp of proportionality.<h3>3. Professional Reliability</h3>Staf does not trust foreign agents, describing them as “potential spies,” and considers it unthinkable to follow orders from a foreign superior.This directly conflicts with the international mandate of the RHC.His spontaneous remark that a “wrong law” may be ignored shows insufficient respect for legal frameworks.The fact that he immediately refers to Ayleen as a moral or legal compass when asked sensitive questions demonstrates a dangerous dependence on a colleague rather than on his own chain of command.<h3>4. Team Dynamics</h3>Although he claims to value the team, his attitude reveals that he seeks an authoritarian role.He confirms that colleagues find him intimidating, attributing this to “extra exercises” he imposed during training.Regarding loyalty, he states that he would “smash the skull” of a colleague who betrays Risur — an unacceptable and aggressive statement in any professional organization.<h3>5. Integrity Concerns</h3>During the interview regarding the missing Axis Island medallions, he accuses colleagues without evidence of selling them or misusing them for personal gain.This suggests either insider knowledge of irregularities or slanderous accusations to deflect responsibility.Both possibilities are serious.<h3>6. Conclusion</h3>Inspector Staf Overflorijn repeatedly demonstrated:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">unprofessional conduct</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">hostile attitudes undermining diplomacy and cooperation</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">insufficient respect for laws and protocols</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">dangerous ideological rigidity</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">aggressive threats</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">lack of accountability</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">clear bias against foreign colleagues</li> </ul>His performance poses a risk to the RHC’s reputation, citizen safety, and internal team cohesion.[HR][/HR]<h3>7. Recommendation</h3>Given the seriousness of the identified issues and the clear indications that Inspector Overflorijn is not performing his duties at the proper level, the audit committee recommends:Demotion of Inspector Staf Belholt to the rank of Assistant Inspector.This demotion should be paired with:<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">mandatory retraining in diplomacy, de-escalation, and civil rights</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">behavioral supervision for six months</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">evaluation sessions with an independent mentor</li> </ul>If no significant improvement occurs, dismissal should be considered.[/spoiler]</blockquote>

Verification