Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Cypherblade's Zeitgeist campaign
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cypherblade" data-source="post: 9814411" data-attributes="member: 7048389"><p>Felix:</p><p>[spoiler]</p><p>Auditor:</p><p>“Agent Greenleaf, thank you for appearing. This is not a disciplinary hearing but an administrative inquiry into the consistency of your reports and your handling of information. Do you understand that?”</p><p></p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><h3>About the Newspaper</h3><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Your name appeared earlier this year in the <em>Flint Observer</em>. How do you explain that?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>I had good contacts with journalist Tarnwell. The information we had regarding the oil issue and the situation involving Mayor McBannin compelled me to act in the interest of public health, and because of that my name ended up in the article.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Did you ask permission from your superiors to speak to the press?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>No, I did not ask for permission, and that’s why I was taken off the McBannin case afterward.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Are you aware that Director Saxby personally had to endure a reprimand because of that article?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>No, I wasn’t aware. I don’t have much direct contact with Director Saxby.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you have any idea how that was perceived at headquarters — a field agent ‘making a name’ in the newspaper while cases are still open?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>It wasn’t my intention at all to draw attention. I was surprised myself; the journalist, Lydia, included me in the article without consulting me.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Will you take measures to avoid this in the future?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>Yes, I will request permission before speaking to the press from now on.</em></p><p></p><p></p><h3>About His Reports</h3><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Your reports contain conspicuous gaps. You describe ‘a confrontation at the docks’, but there’s no mention of time, location, or witnesses. How do you explain that?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>Inspector Kane is much better at administrative reporting, which is why I often leave the detailed documentation to him.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Would you say you prefer working ‘in the field’ rather than behind a desk?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>Yes, I clearly prefer fieldwork over desk work.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “You often write lines such as ‘according to the observations of colleague Kane’. Is that laziness, or a deliberate choice to spread responsibility?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>It is a deliberate choice. I value Kane for his leadership and seniority, and I trust his observations.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you consider administrative negligence less serious than negligence in an investigation?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>I consider the investigation itself more important, and my reports are often based on partial memories. I rarely consult old case files, so I see little use in doing so.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Has anyone ever helped you rewrite or supplement your reports?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>No, I usually work alone and I don’t recall any situation where someone helped me.</em></p><p></p><p></p><h3>About Reputation and Motivation</h3><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you see yourself as someone who serves the RHC, or someone who is simply ‘trying to do the right thing’?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>I try to balance both as well as I can, always keeping the interests of Risur in mind.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “What would you do if the interests of the RHC and those of Risur didn’t align?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>That would really surprise me. Our mission is to protect the country. Power struggles can happen, but in cases of true national importance — like when the King’s sister was involved — people naturally follow the path that serves the nation.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you feel you’ve ever been treated unfairly by Saxby or others?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>No, I don’t feel unfairly treated, not even regarding the incident with the newspaper. The whole affair was exaggerated in my opinion.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Has a colleague ever encouraged you to leave certain facts out of a report?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>On the contrary. During a discussion with Stover he advised me not to mention something, but I felt the truth should take precedence over the order of a superior.</em></p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p>Other</p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “The Axis Island reports mention various discovered artifacts. How is it that these artifacts cannot be found in the archive?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>Everything related to those items went through Ayleen. I don’t know where they are now. You’ll have to ask her.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Finally: what is your assessment of the incident involving Inspector Overflorijn?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>I cannot condone what happened. Staf lost control and in my view he overreacted.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “How would you feel if Inspector Kelrin were promoted?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>Kane is the calmest and often acts as the anchor of the team. Saria is also stable, though in a different way. I would like to take on that role more strongly myself. I’m open to a higher rank, but only if I can remain active in the field. I don’t know how the others would respond, but I personally have no issue with it.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you see yourself in a leadership role?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>I’ve been with the RHC for three years, but administration is really my weak point. Still, I think I add value in the field and contribute positively to team dynamics, but not as a leader.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you support giving Inspector Overflorijn a second chance?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>Yes, I hope he takes that chance, though I am concerned about the seriousness of the situation.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Can you clarify those concerns?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>He sometimes puts the team in danger. He doesn’t always make the best choices to protect us. He throws away his weapons, forgets his armor… sometimes he makes extremely impulsive decisions.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you have a proposal to help him?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>I don’t have a fully worked-out proposal, but perhaps a mentor — someone with a military background — could help stabilize him.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Your file mentions chaotic effects when you use your magic. How do you see that yourself?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>In my view that is limited to myself, but I don’t know exactly where it comes from. Precautionary measures are taken in accordance with the rulebook.</em></p><p></p><p><strong>Question:</strong> “Do you have any comments or additions?”</p><p><strong>Answer:</strong> <em>No, I have no further comments.</em></p><p></p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><h2><strong>Evaluation Report – Felix Greenleaf</strong></h2><p></p><p>Prepared by: Director Lauryn Cyneburg</p><p>Department: RHC Internal Control and Integrity Oversight / Slate</p><p>Subject: Evaluation of professional conduct, integrity, and suitability of Inspector Felix Greenleaf / Flint</p><p>Date: 10 Autumn 500 AOV</p><p></p><p><strong>1. Summary</strong></p><p>Over the past period, Felix has demonstrated strong investigative skills and a significant sense of responsibility. He takes initiative, remains calm under pressure, and shows growing ability to think analytically within complex cases. At the same time, there are several areas where further development is possible, particularly in team communication, prioritization, and case documentation.</p><p></p><p></p><p>[HR][/HR]</p><p></p><h2><strong>2. Strengths</strong></h2><p><strong>2.1 Analytical Ability</strong></p><p>Felix can quickly draw connections between clues and shows a solid understanding of both factual and magical components of a case. His reasoning is generally logical, thorough, and accurate.</p><p></p><p><strong>2.2 Stress Resilience</strong></p><p>During crisis situations (such as interrogations, unexpected confrontations, or emotional witnesses), Felix remains remarkably calm and focused. This contributes to stability within the team.</p><p></p><h3><strong>2.3 Perseverance</strong></h3><p>Felix does not give up when a lead goes cold. He is willing to investigate new angles, helping to break open stalled investigations.</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>3. Areas for Improvement</strong></p><p><strong>3.1 Communication Within the Team</strong></p><p>Felix is sometimes inclined to take steps independently without adequately sharing them with the team. This can lead to misunderstandings or duplicated efforts.</p><p><strong>Recommendation:</strong> provide more frequent interim updates, especially when a hypothesis changes or when new evidence is found.</p><p></p><p><strong>3.2 Prioritization and Focus</strong></p><p></p><p>Felix shows enthusiasm for details but occasionally gets caught up in secondary aspects of a case, which can cost time.</p><p><strong>Recommendation:</strong> for each new lead, briefly assess whether it aligns with the core questions of the investigation.</p><p></p><h3><strong>3.3 Written Reporting</strong></h3><p></p><p>Although Felix is strong in verbal communication, his written reports can sometimes be more concise and structured.</p><p><strong>Recommendation:</strong> use standardized report templates and work with clear headings, conclusions, and action points.</p><p></p><p></p><h2><strong>4. Development Goals for the Coming Period</strong></h2> <ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Provide <strong>at least one brief team update per shift</strong> (verbally or via the internal logbook).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Work with a prioritization list</strong> for each case to maintain focus.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Attend two internal writing trainings</strong>, aimed at short, clear report structure.</li> </ul><p></p><h2><strong>5. Final Conclusion</strong></h2><p>Felix is a valuable asset to the investigative team, with strong analytical skills and a reliable work ethic. With continued attention to communication, structure, and assertiveness, he will grow into one of the most complete and effective investigators within the department.</p><p>[/spoiler]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cypherblade, post: 9814411, member: 7048389"] Felix: [spoiler] Auditor: “Agent Greenleaf, thank you for appearing. This is not a disciplinary hearing but an administrative inquiry into the consistency of your reports and your handling of information. Do you understand that?” [HR][/HR] [HEADING=2]About the Newspaper[/HEADING] [B]Question:[/B] “Your name appeared earlier this year in the [I]Flint Observer[/I]. How do you explain that?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]I had good contacts with journalist Tarnwell. The information we had regarding the oil issue and the situation involving Mayor McBannin compelled me to act in the interest of public health, and because of that my name ended up in the article.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Did you ask permission from your superiors to speak to the press?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]No, I did not ask for permission, and that’s why I was taken off the McBannin case afterward.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Are you aware that Director Saxby personally had to endure a reprimand because of that article?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]No, I wasn’t aware. I don’t have much direct contact with Director Saxby.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you have any idea how that was perceived at headquarters — a field agent ‘making a name’ in the newspaper while cases are still open?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]It wasn’t my intention at all to draw attention. I was surprised myself; the journalist, Lydia, included me in the article without consulting me.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Will you take measures to avoid this in the future?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]Yes, I will request permission before speaking to the press from now on.[/I] [HEADING=2]About His Reports[/HEADING] [B]Question:[/B] “Your reports contain conspicuous gaps. You describe ‘a confrontation at the docks’, but there’s no mention of time, location, or witnesses. How do you explain that?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]Inspector Kane is much better at administrative reporting, which is why I often leave the detailed documentation to him.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Would you say you prefer working ‘in the field’ rather than behind a desk?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]Yes, I clearly prefer fieldwork over desk work.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “You often write lines such as ‘according to the observations of colleague Kane’. Is that laziness, or a deliberate choice to spread responsibility?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]It is a deliberate choice. I value Kane for his leadership and seniority, and I trust his observations.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you consider administrative negligence less serious than negligence in an investigation?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]I consider the investigation itself more important, and my reports are often based on partial memories. I rarely consult old case files, so I see little use in doing so.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Has anyone ever helped you rewrite or supplement your reports?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]No, I usually work alone and I don’t recall any situation where someone helped me.[/I] [HEADING=2]About Reputation and Motivation[/HEADING] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you see yourself as someone who serves the RHC, or someone who is simply ‘trying to do the right thing’?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]I try to balance both as well as I can, always keeping the interests of Risur in mind.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “What would you do if the interests of the RHC and those of Risur didn’t align?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]That would really surprise me. Our mission is to protect the country. Power struggles can happen, but in cases of true national importance — like when the King’s sister was involved — people naturally follow the path that serves the nation.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you feel you’ve ever been treated unfairly by Saxby or others?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]No, I don’t feel unfairly treated, not even regarding the incident with the newspaper. The whole affair was exaggerated in my opinion.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Has a colleague ever encouraged you to leave certain facts out of a report?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]On the contrary. During a discussion with Stover he advised me not to mention something, but I felt the truth should take precedence over the order of a superior.[/I] [HR][/HR] Other [B]Question:[/B] “The Axis Island reports mention various discovered artifacts. How is it that these artifacts cannot be found in the archive?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]Everything related to those items went through Ayleen. I don’t know where they are now. You’ll have to ask her.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Finally: what is your assessment of the incident involving Inspector Overflorijn?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]I cannot condone what happened. Staf lost control and in my view he overreacted.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “How would you feel if Inspector Kelrin were promoted?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]Kane is the calmest and often acts as the anchor of the team. Saria is also stable, though in a different way. I would like to take on that role more strongly myself. I’m open to a higher rank, but only if I can remain active in the field. I don’t know how the others would respond, but I personally have no issue with it.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you see yourself in a leadership role?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]I’ve been with the RHC for three years, but administration is really my weak point. Still, I think I add value in the field and contribute positively to team dynamics, but not as a leader.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you support giving Inspector Overflorijn a second chance?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]Yes, I hope he takes that chance, though I am concerned about the seriousness of the situation.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Can you clarify those concerns?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]He sometimes puts the team in danger. He doesn’t always make the best choices to protect us. He throws away his weapons, forgets his armor… sometimes he makes extremely impulsive decisions.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you have a proposal to help him?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]I don’t have a fully worked-out proposal, but perhaps a mentor — someone with a military background — could help stabilize him.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Your file mentions chaotic effects when you use your magic. How do you see that yourself?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]In my view that is limited to myself, but I don’t know exactly where it comes from. Precautionary measures are taken in accordance with the rulebook.[/I] [B]Question:[/B] “Do you have any comments or additions?” [B]Answer:[/B] [I]No, I have no further comments.[/I] [HR][/HR] [HEADING=1][B]Evaluation Report – Felix Greenleaf[/B][/HEADING] Prepared by: Director Lauryn Cyneburg Department: RHC Internal Control and Integrity Oversight / Slate Subject: Evaluation of professional conduct, integrity, and suitability of Inspector Felix Greenleaf / Flint Date: 10 Autumn 500 AOV [B]1. Summary[/B] Over the past period, Felix has demonstrated strong investigative skills and a significant sense of responsibility. He takes initiative, remains calm under pressure, and shows growing ability to think analytically within complex cases. At the same time, there are several areas where further development is possible, particularly in team communication, prioritization, and case documentation. [HR][/HR] [HEADING=1][B]2. Strengths[/B][/HEADING] [B]2.1 Analytical Ability[/B] Felix can quickly draw connections between clues and shows a solid understanding of both factual and magical components of a case. His reasoning is generally logical, thorough, and accurate. [B]2.2 Stress Resilience[/B] During crisis situations (such as interrogations, unexpected confrontations, or emotional witnesses), Felix remains remarkably calm and focused. This contributes to stability within the team. [HEADING=2][B]2.3 Perseverance[/B][/HEADING] Felix does not give up when a lead goes cold. He is willing to investigate new angles, helping to break open stalled investigations. [B]3. Areas for Improvement 3.1 Communication Within the Team[/B] Felix is sometimes inclined to take steps independently without adequately sharing them with the team. This can lead to misunderstandings or duplicated efforts. [B]Recommendation:[/B] provide more frequent interim updates, especially when a hypothesis changes or when new evidence is found. [B]3.2 Prioritization and Focus[/B] Felix shows enthusiasm for details but occasionally gets caught up in secondary aspects of a case, which can cost time. [B]Recommendation:[/B] for each new lead, briefly assess whether it aligns with the core questions of the investigation. [HEADING=2][B]3.3 Written Reporting[/B][/HEADING] Although Felix is strong in verbal communication, his written reports can sometimes be more concise and structured. [B]Recommendation:[/B] use standardized report templates and work with clear headings, conclusions, and action points. [HEADING=1][B]4. Development Goals for the Coming Period[/B][/HEADING] [LIST] [*]Provide [B]at least one brief team update per shift[/B] (verbally or via the internal logbook). [*][B]Work with a prioritization list[/B] for each case to maintain focus. [*][B]Attend two internal writing trainings[/B], aimed at short, clear report structure. [/LIST] [HEADING=1][B]5. Final Conclusion[/B][/HEADING] Felix is a valuable asset to the investigative team, with strong analytical skills and a reliable work ethic. With continued attention to communication, structure, and assertiveness, he will grow into one of the most complete and effective investigators within the department. [/spoiler] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
EN Publishing
Cypherblade's Zeitgeist campaign
Top