Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ECMO3" data-source="post: 9436181" data-attributes="member: 7030563">So I agree with you for the most part, but I question if WOTC spent enough money or time playtesting the things that were not in the playtest online.I want to be clear - overall I really like the 2024 rules.  I play 4 weekly games and 3 of them are switching immediately.  One is going to probably switch after 20th level when we start over.At the same time I think the rules are sloppy and there are a lot of things the designers did not think through ... more things than they did not think through in 2014.   Dual Wielding is one example, weapon switching is another, the interplay between Alert and Find Familiar is a third, the stunning strike rules and the stunned condition is a fourth.Perhaps I am wrong, but I feel like the 2024 rules were rushed out without enough scrutiny.  That doesn't mean they are bad, nor does it mean they are worse than 2014.As far as WOTC goes, I love WOTC.  I would argue they are better than any other game company I have experience with.   I am saying I think you are wrong when you say they are not better ..... they ARE BETTER, but they are not faultless.</blockquote>